The impact of enterprise architecture management on information systems architecture complexity

Abstract

Significant investments in information systems (IS) over the past decades have led to increasingly complex IS architectures in organisations, which are difficult to understand, operate, and maintain. We investigate this development and associated challenges through a conceptual model that distinguishes four constituent elements of IS architecture complexity by differentiating technological from organisational aspects and structural from dynamic aspects. Building on this conceptualisation, we hypothesise relations between these four IS architecture complexity constructs and investigate their impact on architectural outcomes (i.e., efficiency, flexibility, transparency, and predictability). Using survey data from 249 IS managers, we test our model through a partial least squares (PLS) approach to structural equation modelling (SEM). We find that organisational complexity drives technological complexity and that structural complexity drives dynamic complexity. We also demonstrate that increasing IS architecture complexity has a significant negative impact on efficiency, flexibility, transparency, and predictability. Finally, we show that enterprise architecture management (EAM) helps to offset these negative effects by acting as a moderator in the relation between organisational and technological IS architecture complexity. Thus, organisations without adequate EAM are likely to face large increases in technological complexity due to increasing organisational complexity, whereas organisations with adequate EAM exhibit no such relation.

Digitalization and enterprise architecture management: a perspective on benefits and challenges

“…On the other hand, EAM research is rarely based on theories. Beese et al (2022) revealed the moderating effect of EAM on the relation between organizational and technical complexity. Organizations that use EAM are able to avoid an increase in technological complexity due to increased organizational complexity.…”

Enterprise Architecture for Equipment Performance Analysis Based on Internet of Things (IoT) Technology in the Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry

“…The authors incorporated TOGAF into the institution's operations to ensure a streamlined procedure, addressing issues such as the lack of a specific financial system and the absence of detailed information and functionalities in the staffing system. Another focus of [5] 's research was evaluating EA implementation to support Industry 4.0. Interviews and surveys were used to assess the planning and capabilities of EA in this context.…”

Distributed Communicative Language Training Platform Using Automatic Speech Recognition Technology for Smart University

“…The synthesis of documents and research related to the DCLT process involves: The compositions of distributed enterprise. A distributed enterprise consists of four components: 1) Distributed business [48][49][50][51][52] is the organization's main strategy, which takes into account the goals, vision, mission, and business operations of each campus. It consists of two sub-components: (1.1) strategy and (1.2) business process.…”

“…It consists of three sub-components: (2.1) business applications, (2.2) supporting applications, and (2.3) application programming interfaces. 3) Distributed information [57][58][59][60][61] is the management of all data from organizational processes on every campus. It consists of two sub-components: (3.1) relational information and (3.2) non-relational information.…”