2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4348-9_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Energetic Particle Precipitation on the Chemical Composition of the Middle Atmosphere: Measurements and Model Predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qualitatively, these results agree very well with observations. However, while the amount of NOx produced by the solar particle event is in reasonable agreement with observations in the stratosphere and lower mesosphere (see, for example, Funke et al 2011), the amount of NOx transported down after the strong warming is underestimated by the model quite considerably (see, for example, Lopez-Puertas et al 2006 andSinnhuber et al 2012) (2006) and Seppälä et al (2007a). There are two possible sources for the underestimation of the NOx values: (1) a problem with the parameterisation of NOx formation by ion chemistry in the upper mesosphere/lower thermosphere; the model uses a parameterisation of NOx production based on Porter et al (1976) and Rusch et al (1981), which underestimates NOx production in the upper mesosphere and lower thermosphere (see Sect.…”
Section: Sudden Stratospheric Warmings and The Role Of Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Qualitatively, these results agree very well with observations. However, while the amount of NOx produced by the solar particle event is in reasonable agreement with observations in the stratosphere and lower mesosphere (see, for example, Funke et al 2011), the amount of NOx transported down after the strong warming is underestimated by the model quite considerably (see, for example, Lopez-Puertas et al 2006 andSinnhuber et al 2012) (2006) and Seppälä et al (2007a). There are two possible sources for the underestimation of the NOx values: (1) a problem with the parameterisation of NOx formation by ion chemistry in the upper mesosphere/lower thermosphere; the model uses a parameterisation of NOx production based on Porter et al (1976) and Rusch et al (1981), which underestimates NOx production in the upper mesosphere and lower thermosphere (see Sect.…”
Section: Sudden Stratospheric Warmings and The Role Of Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Rusch et al (1981); the ground state and excited states of N are partitioned according to Porter et al (1976), see also Tables 3, 4 , 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. 2 More details can be found in Winkler (2007), Winkler et al (2008), and Sinnhuber et al (2012). A full list of the reactions, reaction rates, and references for the reaction rates used for the positive ion chemistry of UBIC as used here is given in Tables 3-11. UBIC may act as an ion-chemistry module, attached to a neutral chemistry host model.…”
Section: The Response Of Stratospheric and Tropospheric Dynamics To Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, solar proton events (SPEs) occurring in relation to solar variabilities such as solar flares and coronal mass ejections are known to cause significant changes in ozone and other chemical constituents in the stratosphere and mesosphere [7,8]. Energetic electrons also precipitate into the polar atmosphere with a broad energy range from a few eV to MeV, resulting from the interactions of the solar wind, the magnetosphere and the polar ionosphere, to change chemical compositions through inelastic collisions with the ambient atmospheric molecular species (N 2 and O 2 ) [9][10][11][12][13]. The low-energy auroral electrons (1 eV-10 keV) precipitate into the lower thermosphere above about 100 km altitude and lead to a significant amount of the production of nitric oxide (NO).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precipitating energetic electrons and protons (eV–MeV) from the Earth's magnetosphere are important sources of the production of nitrogen oxides, NO x = NO + NO 2 , in the polar middle and upper atmosphere. Precipitating energetic particles produce NO x by colliding with the abundant molecular species (N 2 and O 2 ), which leads to excitation, dissociation, ionization, or dissociative ionization of these species and subsequent ion chemistry (Nieder et al, ; Porter et al, ; Rusch et al, ; Sinnhuber et al, , ). The most of nitric oxide (NO) in the lower thermosphere, above 100 km, is directly produced by auroral electrons (1 eV to 10 keV) in the auroral oval (geomagnetic altitudes of 60–75°; Siskind et al, ; Solomon et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important mechanism by particle precipitation is the formation of odd hydrogen, HO x = H + OH + HO 2 , from water vapor (H 2 O) via positive ion chemistry involving water clusters (Swider & Keneshea, ). This process is only effective below about 80‐km altitude, where water vapor is enough (Andersson et al, , ; Sinnhuber et al, , ; Solomon et al, ). Below 80 km, however, HO x is negligibly abundant because the chemical lifetime of HO x is fairly short, 0.1–1 day at 75–80 km (Pickett et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%