2010
DOI: 10.1504/eg.2010.029892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of electronic government on democracy: e-democracy through e-participation

Abstract: Electronic government is the use of Information and Communication Technology in the transformation of government; primarily aiming to the improvement of accessibility, effectiveness and responsibility. It is based on the diffusion of the information and the information policy development. Electronic government guides to increasing citizens' participation and active citizens' development affecting the mechanisms of democracy. Electronic democracy (e-democracy) includes technological innovations that allow impro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Electronic governance leads to an increase in citizens' participation, which affects the mechanisms of democracy. " [19] The unification of the concept of electronization and the process of providing freely available information to the population is called e-Government. It is therefore an electronization of platforms for state information systems, whose information flows from Individual surveys are carried out in the field of open data and their use and implementation.…”
Section: Informatisation Of Public Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic governance leads to an increase in citizens' participation, which affects the mechanisms of democracy. " [19] The unification of the concept of electronization and the process of providing freely available information to the population is called e-Government. It is therefore an electronization of platforms for state information systems, whose information flows from Individual surveys are carried out in the field of open data and their use and implementation.…”
Section: Informatisation Of Public Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some scholars express the fear that such direct democracy will contribute to nothing more than mob rule and careless policymaking, and that the abundance of information provided by the Internet will add to frequent misinformation that makes sensible political dialogue impossible (Hill & Hughes, 1998).Regardless of this opinion and other critiques (see Breindl, 2010), the new ICTs and especially e-participation tools, services and collaboration activities are being championed by variety of authorities, policymakers and other more or less institutionalized actors as invaluable features of the information-based network society and conceived as improving society (Spirakis, Spiraki, & Nikolopoulos, 2010). Table 1.…”
Section: Journal Of Public Administration and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We position such engagement as social awareness (Bickford and Reynolds, 2002;Green and Kamimura, 2003), which is considered a key component of consciousness-raising related to the impetus of social change movements (Bickford and Reynolds, 2002). A person with high social awareness will tend to better understand how a democracy works and exhibit greater interest in the US political system and government or community policies (Giroux, 1987;Spirakis et al, 2010;Swift, 1990). Previous research had linked social awareness to individuals' attitudes and cognitive development (Perry, 1970;Piaget, 1975;Tsui, 2000).…”
Section: Social Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%