The Impact of Different WRF Model Physical Parameterizations and Their Interactions on Warm Season MCS Rainfall

Abstract

In recent years, a mixed-physics ensemble approach has been investigated as a method to better predict mesoscale convective system (MCS) rainfall. For both mixed-physics ensemble design and interpretation, knowledge of the general impact of various physical schemes and their interactions on warm season MCS rainfall forecasts would be useful. Adopting the newly emerging Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for this purpose would further emphasize such benefits. To pursue this goal, a matrix of 18 WRF model configurations, created using different physical scheme combinations, was run with 12-km grid spacing for eight International H2O Project (IHOP) MCS cases. For each case, three different treatments of convection, three different microphysical schemes, and two different planetary boundary layer schemes were used. Sensitivity to physics changes was determined using the correspondence ratio and the squared correlation coefficient. The factor separation method was also used to quantify in detail the impacts of the variation of two different physical schemes and their interaction on the simulated rainfall. Skill score measures averaged over all eight cases for all 18 configurations indicated that no one configuration was obviously best at all times and thresholds. The greatest variability in forecasts was found to come from changes in the choice of convective scheme, although notable impacts also occurred from changes in the microphysics and planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes. Specifically, changes in convective treatment notably impacted the forecast of system average rain rate, while forecasts of total domain rain volume were influenced by choices of microphysics and convective treatment. The impact of interactions (synergy) of different physical schemes, although occasionally of comparable magnitude to the impacts from changing one scheme alone (compared to a control run), varied greatly among cases and over time, and was typically not statistically significant. KeywordsAgronomy, boundary layers, computer simulation, correlation methods, mathematical models, rain, mesoscale convective system (MCS) rainfall, planetary boundary layer, weather research and forecasting (WRF) model, weather forecasting, cloud microphysics, convective system, ensemble forecasting, forecasting method, parameterization ABSTRACTIn recent years, a mixed-physics ensemble approach has been investigated as a method to better predict mesoscale convective system (MCS) rainfall. For both mixed-physics ensemble design and interpretation, knowledge of the general impact of various physical schemes and their interactions on warm season MCS rainfall forecasts would be useful. Adopting the newly emerging Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for this purpose would further emphasize such benefits. To pursue this goal, a matrix of 18 WRF model configurations, created using different physical scheme combinations, was run with 12-km grid spacing for eight International H 2 O Project (IHOP) MCS cases. For each case, three diffe...

Improvements in WRF simulation skills of southeastern United States summer rainfall: physical parameterization and horizontal resolution

“…The Kain-Fritsch (K-F) scheme (Kain 2004) produces the largest deviation (3.8 times larger than the observations), while the ZhangMcFarlane scheme (Zhang and McFarlane 1995) produces the deviation value closest to the observations. Overall, the sensitivity experiments reflect the importance of the cumulus schemes in rainfall simulation over the SE US, which has also been emphasized in previous studies (e.g., Jankov et al 2005;Bukovsky and ) of SE US summer precipitation climatology as calculated from discrete cosine transform (DCT); the color scale has been log-scaled; b power spectrum versus spatial wavelength: the x-axis in the bottom (top) is the number of wave per kilometer (wavelength). The red dashed line denotes wavelength = 60 km, where power spectrum decreases to 1 % of that with the largest wavelength…”

A sensitivity study of the WRF model in wind simulation for an area of high wind energy

“…In published literature, one can find an extensive list of different parameterization schemes depicting the same physical process, and several studies were conducted aiming to investigate the model performance on the simulation of meteorological variables under different physical parameterization schemes (Awan et al, 2011;Chigullapalli and Mölders, 2008;Gallus and Bresch, 2006;Gilliam and Pleim, 2010;Gilliam et al, 2007;Hutchinson et al, 2005;Jankov et al, 2005Jankov et al, , 2007Krieger et al, 2009). Challa et al (2009) performed a simulation study of mesoscale coastal circulations in Mississippi Gulf coast with the WRF model, concluding that the YSU scheme shows improvement over MYJ scheme in the simulation of internal boundary layer characteristics and the overall performance of predicted mean variables.…”

Relative impacts of land use and climate change on summer precipitation in the Netherlands

“…The sensitivity to different parameterization schemes was not specifically investigated in this study, while this is known to be important (Gallus and Bresch, 2006;Jankov et al, 2005;Rajeevan et al, 2010;Ruiz et al, 2010;Zeng et al, 2012;ter Maat et al, 2013). The chosen YSU PBL scheme is a first-order nonlocal scheme that is widely used under convective conditions (Hu et al, 2010).…”