2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of diabetes mellitus on major amputation among patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia undergoing elective endovascular therapy- a nationwide propensity score adjusted analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result differs from our previous study on patients endovascularly revascularized for CLTI, in which patients with DM and CLTI had a higher risk of major amputation. 9 After bypass surgery for CLTI on the other hand, two previous studies reported no difference in major amputation rate among patients with DM compared to those without DM, despite more advanced occlusive atherosclerotic lesions in DM resulting in a need of a lower level of the distal bypass anastomoses. 26,27 To be able to achieve equal results in patients with and without DM after bypass, however, it appears necessary to use the saphena magna vein as a bypass conduit, either as reversed bypass 27 or with an in situ technique, 26 and that the bypass is performed by a limited number of experienced vascular surgeons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result differs from our previous study on patients endovascularly revascularized for CLTI, in which patients with DM and CLTI had a higher risk of major amputation. 9 After bypass surgery for CLTI on the other hand, two previous studies reported no difference in major amputation rate among patients with DM compared to those without DM, despite more advanced occlusive atherosclerotic lesions in DM resulting in a need of a lower level of the distal bypass anastomoses. 26,27 To be able to achieve equal results in patients with and without DM after bypass, however, it appears necessary to use the saphena magna vein as a bypass conduit, either as reversed bypass 27 or with an in situ technique, 26 and that the bypass is performed by a limited number of experienced vascular surgeons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…30 The present study showed a higher cumulative incidence rate of stroke and AMI in the group with DM, whereas Swedish patients with CLTI and DM undergoing endovascular therapy had a higher cumulative incidence rate of AMI only. 9 It is well-known that DM patients have a twofold increased risk of atherothrombotic ischemic stroke compared to those without DM, 31 and it can be speculated that patients needing an open vascular procedure have a more advanced generalized atherosclerotic disease rendering them more susceptible for ischemic stroke. In line with the present study results, Wallaert et al found a higher risk of major adverse composite events (myocardial infarction, dysrhythmia, congestive heart failure, wound infection, major amputation, and renal insufficiency) among patients with DM following lower extremity bypass surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diabetes was also an unfavorable predictor of loss of patency. Many studies have reported less success with endovascular treatment in diabetic patients[19,20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of developing CLTI four-fold (Becker et al 2011). Among patients who had undergone endovascular therapy for CLTI, the presence of DM further increased the risk of major LEA and myocardial infarction (Lilja et al 2020), signifying that CLTI in diabetics is more challenging to treat. In Asia, the burden of PAD and DM is already projected to increase, and the majority of Asian patients with PAD may have concomitant DM (Kawarada et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%