Proceedings 33rd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture. MICRO-33 2000
DOI: 10.1109/micro.2000.898059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of delay on the design of branch predictors

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a previous study on branch prediction delay shows that a relatively accurate single-cycle latency predictor outperforms a 100% accurate predictor with two cycles of latency [2].…”
Section: Accuracy Vs Delaymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, a previous study on branch prediction delay shows that a relatively accurate single-cycle latency predictor outperforms a 100% accurate predictor with two cycles of latency [2].…”
Section: Accuracy Vs Delaymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, the fetch address generation should be done in a single cycle because this address is needed for fetching instructions in the next cycle. However, the increase in processor clock frequency, as well as the slower wires in modern technologies, cause branch prediction tables to require multi-cycle accesses [1,10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different approach is the overriding mechanism described by Jimenez et al [10]. This mechanism provides two predictions, a first prediction coming from a fast branch predictor, and a second prediction coming from a slower, but more accurate predictor.…”
Section: Prediction Overridingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations