2016
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2015.2504339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Deadline Misses on the Control Performance of High-End Motion Control Systems

Abstract: Abstract-In high-end motion control systems the real-time computational platform must execute tasks from multiple control loops operating at high sampling rates. In recent years traditional special-purpose platforms have been replaced by generalpurpose multi-processor platforms, which introduce significant fluctuations in execution times. While considering worst-case execution times would severely reduce the sampling rates, accepting deadline misses and assuring that the control system still meets the desired … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The added delay for the Hamming coding is even lower, and at only 200 ns its impact is low enough for this technique to be directly applicable to most power electronics control architectures. For systems with particular requirements in terms of extremely wide control bandwidth or minimal latencies, further techniques for the characterization and compensation of the network latencies are available from modern control theory [28]. However, it is worth noting that by comparing these results with others achieved by similar works [16], the measured latency, even in the case of the RS code, was significantly lower.…”
Section: Latencymentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The added delay for the Hamming coding is even lower, and at only 200 ns its impact is low enough for this technique to be directly applicable to most power electronics control architectures. For systems with particular requirements in terms of extremely wide control bandwidth or minimal latencies, further techniques for the characterization and compensation of the network latencies are available from modern control theory [28]. However, it is worth noting that by comparing these results with others achieved by similar works [16], the measured latency, even in the case of the RS code, was significantly lower.…”
Section: Latencymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the specific typology and magnitude of these effects is highly dependent on the specific control methodology and the parameters of the controlled system. In [28,29], a much more in-depth analysis of these phenomenons in two specific real world scenarios is presented. For these reasons, it is not possible to specify a typical or maximum allowed network latency, that can generally be valid for large classes of applications.…”
Section: Distributed Six-phase Drivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical setup is composed of two masses connected to each other by a flexible bar. The motor is connected directly to one of the masses, and two encoders measure the rotation in each mass [Geelen et al 2016]. The electrical circuit converts the digital actuation signal to an analog input that is applied to the plant.…”
Section: Setup: Motion Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical and electrical circuits are described with the CT LTI model from Equation 1, where the state of the plant x(t) = θ 1 θ 2 ω 1 ω 2 ′ is composed of angular positions (θ 1 , θ 2 ), angular velocities (ω 1 , ω 2 ), and the state and input matrices are defined by (adapted from the model presented in [Geelen et al 2016])…”
Section: Setup: Motion Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many practical embedded real-time systems can de facto sustain a bounded number of deadline-misses. In control engineering, which is the natural application domain of real-time computing, papers have been published [10,16,32,41] showing that it is sometimes possible to guarantee the performance of a control system despite some missed deadlines. Such systems are called weakly-hard real-time systems [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%