2006
DOI: 10.1207/s15326934crj1803_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Culture and Individualism–Collectivism on the Creative Potential and Achievement of American and Chinese Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
65
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in creative collaboration between two groups may indicate that those in collectivist cultures such as China are more likely to cooperate with others or work together as group members than those in individualist cultures. Results of the current study contrast with those of Zha et al [68], who found that American students (vs. Chinese) scored higher on the creative potential factors of fluency, originality, elaboration, and titles. The difference in results could be due to the manner in which creativity was measured.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences in creative collaboration between two groups may indicate that those in collectivist cultures such as China are more likely to cooperate with others or work together as group members than those in individualist cultures. Results of the current study contrast with those of Zha et al [68], who found that American students (vs. Chinese) scored higher on the creative potential factors of fluency, originality, elaboration, and titles. The difference in results could be due to the manner in which creativity was measured.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with members of other cultures, U.S. individuals scored high in achievement motivation, autonomy, impulsiveness, openness to experience, nonconformity, self-confidence, and self-acceptance [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. Zha, Walczyk, Griffith-Ross, Tobacyk and Walczyk [68] compared Chinese and American graduate students and found that American students (vs. Chinese) scored higher on four of the five components of divergent thinking (creative potential factors of fluency, originality, elaboration, and titles) but not flexibility. American students were more individualistic; Chinese were more collectivistic.…”
Section: Creative Attitudes and Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Torrance and his colleagues (e.g., Ball & Torrance, 1978;Torrance & Sato, 1979) also demonstrated cultural differences in participants' performance on divergent thinking tests. A more recent study (Zha, Walczyk, Griffith-Ross, Tobacyk, & Walczyk, 2006) showed that American doctoral students obtained significantly higher divergent thinking scores compared to their Chinese counterparts. These findings were also explained by the cultural differences in creativity.…”
Section: Defining Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it was reported that university students in Mexico were significantly more collectivistic than their counterparts in the United States (Shkodriani & Gibbons, 1995). American graduate students were found with both higher individualism and potential creativity than their Chinese counterparts, while the latter were more collectivistic and higherachieving (Zha, Walczyk, Griffith-Ross, & Tobacyk, 2006). In addition, Uskul, Hynie, and Lalonde (2004) reported that Turkish university students scored higher in interdependent self-construal than their Euro-Canadian counterparts and interdependence mediated the relationship between culture and self-reported actual closeness with family, friends and acquaintances.…”
Section: Self-schema and Achievement Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%