Abstract:Introduction: While SARS-CoV-2’s main transmission route is through respiratory droplets, research has found that viral RNA could be detected in blood samples, causing concerns over the safety of blood donations and blood products. This paper therefore aims to systematically search for studies that have addressed their country’s lack of donations and analyse the risk of blood transfusion-transmission. As such, it will answer the question “should blood services focus more on donation vigilance or worry more abo… Show more
“…The rRT-PCR analysis revealed that all of the tested donated blood samples were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the current study. This is consistent with two recent studies [ 27 , 28 ]. Owusu and his colleagues tested plasma from SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals in Ghana, but they found SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in only 1.03% of the tested plasma samples, concluding that blood transfusion is negligible risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 transmission [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Although coronaviruses typically infect the respiratory tract, viral shedding in serum or plasma is to be expected. This raises concerns about the safety of donated blood products, because it is primarily dependent on voluntary blood donors [ 27 , 28 ]. Given the increasing number of asymptomatic [ 11 , 12 , 13 ] and reactivated SARS-CoV-2 cases [ 14 , 15 ], blood safety and coronaviruses should be prioritized, particularly in high-risk areas [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owusu and his colleagues tested plasma from SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals in Ghana, but they found SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in only 1.03% of the tested plasma samples, concluding that blood transfusion is negligible risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 transmission [ 27 ]. A systematic review and meta-analysis also revealed that SARS-CoV-2 poses no direct threat to blood safety [ 28 ]. On the other hand, SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been found in the blood at varying levels in some published studies [ 39 , 40 ].…”
(1) Backgrounds and Objectives: Since its discovery, information about the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread rapidly. However, many issues remain unresolved. Coronaviruses are primarily transmitted through respiratory secretions. The possibility of transmission via donated blood transfusion deserves studying. This is the first study in Saudi Arabia to look at pre-vaccination donated blood anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody content as a marker for virus transmission via viral RNA positive blood and/or the potential therapeutic value of convalescent plasma. (2) Methods: A total of 300 blood samples were sequentially collected from unvaccinated donors who donated blood to the blood bank of Prince Mutaib Bin Abdulaziz Hospital in Sakaka, Al-Jouf, Saudi Arabia. Specific ELISA was used to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies. SARS-CoV-2 was detected using specific real-time reverse-transcription PCR (rRT-PCR). (3) Results: The prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was low (9%), whereas the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM was high (65%). Relevant demographics, anthropometrics, and lifestyle factors revealed significant associations (p < 0.05) between IgM-positivity only vs. age (age group 21–30 years), postgraduate education, no history of international travel, IgG-negativity, and absence of experience with COVID-19-like symptoms. Furthermore, there are significant associations (p < 0.05) between IgG-positivity only vs. age (age group 21–30 years), postgraduate education, and being a non-healthcare worker. All donors in the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive group (n = 27) had previously experienced symptoms similar to COVID-19 (p < 0.001) and most of them (n = 24) showed anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM-positive test (p = 0.006). However, all the samples tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA using rRT-PCR. (4) Conclusion: Our findings add to the growing body of evidence that donated blood is safe, with the added benefit of convalescent plasma rich in potentially neutralizing IgG and IgM against SARS-CoV-2.
“…The rRT-PCR analysis revealed that all of the tested donated blood samples were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the current study. This is consistent with two recent studies [ 27 , 28 ]. Owusu and his colleagues tested plasma from SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals in Ghana, but they found SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in only 1.03% of the tested plasma samples, concluding that blood transfusion is negligible risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 transmission [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Although coronaviruses typically infect the respiratory tract, viral shedding in serum or plasma is to be expected. This raises concerns about the safety of donated blood products, because it is primarily dependent on voluntary blood donors [ 27 , 28 ]. Given the increasing number of asymptomatic [ 11 , 12 , 13 ] and reactivated SARS-CoV-2 cases [ 14 , 15 ], blood safety and coronaviruses should be prioritized, particularly in high-risk areas [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owusu and his colleagues tested plasma from SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals in Ghana, but they found SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in only 1.03% of the tested plasma samples, concluding that blood transfusion is negligible risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 transmission [ 27 ]. A systematic review and meta-analysis also revealed that SARS-CoV-2 poses no direct threat to blood safety [ 28 ]. On the other hand, SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been found in the blood at varying levels in some published studies [ 39 , 40 ].…”
(1) Backgrounds and Objectives: Since its discovery, information about the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread rapidly. However, many issues remain unresolved. Coronaviruses are primarily transmitted through respiratory secretions. The possibility of transmission via donated blood transfusion deserves studying. This is the first study in Saudi Arabia to look at pre-vaccination donated blood anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody content as a marker for virus transmission via viral RNA positive blood and/or the potential therapeutic value of convalescent plasma. (2) Methods: A total of 300 blood samples were sequentially collected from unvaccinated donors who donated blood to the blood bank of Prince Mutaib Bin Abdulaziz Hospital in Sakaka, Al-Jouf, Saudi Arabia. Specific ELISA was used to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies. SARS-CoV-2 was detected using specific real-time reverse-transcription PCR (rRT-PCR). (3) Results: The prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was low (9%), whereas the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM was high (65%). Relevant demographics, anthropometrics, and lifestyle factors revealed significant associations (p < 0.05) between IgM-positivity only vs. age (age group 21–30 years), postgraduate education, no history of international travel, IgG-negativity, and absence of experience with COVID-19-like symptoms. Furthermore, there are significant associations (p < 0.05) between IgG-positivity only vs. age (age group 21–30 years), postgraduate education, and being a non-healthcare worker. All donors in the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive group (n = 27) had previously experienced symptoms similar to COVID-19 (p < 0.001) and most of them (n = 24) showed anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM-positive test (p = 0.006). However, all the samples tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA using rRT-PCR. (4) Conclusion: Our findings add to the growing body of evidence that donated blood is safe, with the added benefit of convalescent plasma rich in potentially neutralizing IgG and IgM against SARS-CoV-2.
“…With evidence that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is transmissible by asymptomatic individuals and the majority of the individuals being asymptomatic, a threat to blood supply was looming large. While elective procedures were put on hold to deal with the unprecedented crisis in hospitals, shortages of blood for emergencies and multi-transfused patients were reported from major healthcare centres across many countries [1] .…”
“…A systematic review on the impact of COVID-19 on blood transfusion services revealed a 38% decrease in blood donation compared to the prepandemic period (Chiem et al, 2021). Chandler et al (2021) surveyed 1205 European blood donors and found a decrease in the frequency of blood donation and a reduced likelihood to donate in donors with higher adherence to COVID-19 preventive measures.…”
Facemasks represent an essential measure of prevention against the spread of COVID-19; however, they lessen the ability to convey and understand emotions through facial expressions. In blood donation settings, facemasks may interfere with professionals' tasks. This qualitative study aims to describe healthcare staff's experiences, beliefs, and attitudes toward facemask wearing and strategies used to overcome communication and relational barriers along the blood donation process.Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 25 healthcare professionals (14 physicians and 11 nurses) working in Italian blood donation centers. The framework analysis method was used to organize the data and identify emerging themes. More than 70% of participants reported discomfort and a negative impact on communicating effectively with donors and building empathic relationships. The difficulty to detect early signs of adverse reactions was reported by almost all nurses, and physicians were concerned that facemasks limited the identification of donors and the detection of deferral criteria. Facemasks have changed the blood donation process, reducing the healthcare professionals' ability to build empathic relationships and communicate with donors effectively. New strategies should be developed to overcome these limitations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.