2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of COVID-19 on a cohort of origin residents and internal migrants from South Africa's rural northeast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent evidence from the Agincourt study area showed that migrants compared to non-migrants, and men compared to women, each had ∼70% lower odds of health service use in the last 12-months among individuals living with a chronic condition ( 15 ). However to interpret of our finding, there are two scenarios to consider; that educational and health selectivity upon migration ( 39 , 40 ) or observed health and wellbeing benefits occurring post-migration ( 41 ) is mediated through improved socio-economic status ( 42 , 43 ), which cannot be demonstrated using a cross-sectional design. Taking previous data into consideration, we posit that while migrants are at risk of gaps in healthcare engagement continuity, being more educated (i.e., higher socio-economic status and health literacy) helps overcoming barriers to accessing healthcare (i.e., both when at destination and origin) confers the preventive benefit to multimorbidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Recent evidence from the Agincourt study area showed that migrants compared to non-migrants, and men compared to women, each had ∼70% lower odds of health service use in the last 12-months among individuals living with a chronic condition ( 15 ). However to interpret of our finding, there are two scenarios to consider; that educational and health selectivity upon migration ( 39 , 40 ) or observed health and wellbeing benefits occurring post-migration ( 41 ) is mediated through improved socio-economic status ( 42 , 43 ), which cannot be demonstrated using a cross-sectional design. Taking previous data into consideration, we posit that while migrants are at risk of gaps in healthcare engagement continuity, being more educated (i.e., higher socio-economic status and health literacy) helps overcoming barriers to accessing healthcare (i.e., both when at destination and origin) confers the preventive benefit to multimorbidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…International migrants may face additional hurdles due to new South African laws restricting employment of foreign workers [ 61 ]. In addition, Covid-related restrictions during the time of this study further tightened job opportunities and exacerbated vulnerabilities for those working in South Africa’s informal labor sector [ 62 , 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately a third of participants had not tested for HIV in the past year, despite the fact that testing at least annually has been shown to reduce the burden of undiagnosed HIV [ 13 ], and testing remains an important entry point for engagement in HIV care [ 74 – 76 ]. However, it may be difficult to interpret these data in the setting of Covid-related restrictions, which likely had an impact on HIV testing and other healthcare engagement for all participants during the year preceding this study [ 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not possible to determine the reasons for the attrition of the 11 sample members who could not be tracked, and therefore whether this attrition is differential and might affect our analysis. For instance, it is possible that attrition rates are higher among those who migrated between 2017 and 2020, including migration as a response to the pandemic shock (Ginsburg et al, 2022 ; Posel & Casale, 2021 ). At the same time, in a context in which cell phone theft and loss are high and in which cell phones are often shared, it was to be expected that a considerable proportion of respondents would not be reached on the numbers that they provided three years prior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the results reported in Table 1 do not account for potential migratory responses to the pandemic shock. Ginsburg et al, ( 2022 ) and Posel & Casale ( 2021 ) demonstrate that in the South African context of spatially ‘stretched’ households and circular migration between rural (labour sending) and urban (labour receiving) areas, the pandemic shock led to substantial urban-to-rural migration. Posel & Casale ( 2021 ), using NIDS-CRAM data, estimate that 16 per cent of adults in South Africa moved households during the early months of the pandemic.…”
Section: The Economic Impact Of the Pandemic: A Quantitative Snapshotmentioning
confidence: 99%