2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10997-017-9386-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of corporate governance on auditor choice: evidence from Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…and Mauler (2015) In the non-US setting, Ashbaugh and Warfield (2003) found that German companies are more likely to hire dominant auditors when companies contract with creditor stakeholders, dispersed shareholders, and foreign suppliers. Quick, Schenk, Schmidt, and Towara (2018) found that audit committee meeting frequency and the size of the supervisory board are associated positively with the appointment of a Big N audit firm in Germany. Lin and Liu (2009) (Cheng & Leung, 2012;Lai et al, 2017); and linking corporate boards and audit committees to the auditor appointment directly will certainly enrich our understanding of the incentives and motivations of auditor choice.…”
Section: Auditor Choice In Business Groupsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and Mauler (2015) In the non-US setting, Ashbaugh and Warfield (2003) found that German companies are more likely to hire dominant auditors when companies contract with creditor stakeholders, dispersed shareholders, and foreign suppliers. Quick, Schenk, Schmidt, and Towara (2018) found that audit committee meeting frequency and the size of the supervisory board are associated positively with the appointment of a Big N audit firm in Germany. Lin and Liu (2009) (Cheng & Leung, 2012;Lai et al, 2017); and linking corporate boards and audit committees to the auditor appointment directly will certainly enrich our understanding of the incentives and motivations of auditor choice.…”
Section: Auditor Choice In Business Groupsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the non‐US setting, Ashbaugh and Warfield () found that German companies are more likely to hire dominant auditors when companies contract with creditor stakeholders, dispersed shareholders, and foreign suppliers. Quick, Schenk, Schmidt, and Towara () found that audit committee meeting frequency and the size of the supervisory board are associated positively with the appointment of a Big N audit firm in Germany. Lin and Liu () found that firms with higher ownership concentration or smaller sized supervisory board, or firms in which the CEO and board of director's chairman are the same people, are less likely to hire a high‐quality auditor in China.…”
Section: Determinants Of Auditor Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results, however, could not report any significant relation between board size and auditor choice. Similarly, Quick et al (2018) examined the same issue in the German market and found evidence of a positive relation between board size and the selection of a Big 4 audit firm. It appears, therefore, that board size may be influential in the selection of the audit firm type.…”
Section: Board Sizementioning
confidence: 98%
“…As indicated, much of the auditor choice research has been concentrated on audit markets of Anglo-Saxon and developed countries' markets (e.g., Beasley and Petroni, 2001;Abbot et al 2003;Ashbaugh and Warfield, 2003;Srinidhi et al 2014;Quick et al 2018), with only very limited research performed in other markets. Moreover, although a few empirical studies were conducted to investigate relation between CG and auditor choice in some developing markets (e.g., Lin and Liu, 2009;Husnin et al 2016), there has been very limited research examining auditor choice in the Middle East region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are categorized into developed, developing economies as well as studies conducted within the Nigerian context. Quick, et. al.…”
Section: Empirical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%