2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2008.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of corporate governance on auditor choice: Evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
198
3
15

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(149 reference statements)
18
198
3
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The CEO, as the executive leader of a firm, is the final decision-maker in terms of entity operations. It is not uncommon that the chairman and CEO are the same person in the United States, while in most European countries, these two roles are most often separated (Lin and Liu, 2009). The different practices across countries reveal the costs and benefits of the chairman's duality role (Braun and Sharma, 2007).…”
Section: Ceo As Chairman Of the Boardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CEO, as the executive leader of a firm, is the final decision-maker in terms of entity operations. It is not uncommon that the chairman and CEO are the same person in the United States, while in most European countries, these two roles are most often separated (Lin and Liu, 2009). The different practices across countries reveal the costs and benefits of the chairman's duality role (Braun and Sharma, 2007).…”
Section: Ceo As Chairman Of the Boardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since larger ownership concentration creates more incentive to expropriate minority's wealth, so there is a higher perceived riskiness for a larger percentage of total shares held by the largest owner. Thus, the following hypothesis is derived: CEO duality allows for little transparency via a lack of monitoring on the CEO's actions as he/she has a significant influence on BOD decision (Lin & Liu, 2009;Kim et al, 2009). It can be said that by having duality on the CEO post, the CEO has a greater incentive to pursue his/her private interest without being challenged thus, reflecting bad CG.…”
Section: Hypothesis 1cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin & Liu (2009) argued that the incentive for opaqueness gains among the listed companies in China induced by the bearish state of China's economy between [2001][2002][2003][2004].Relating this situation to the companies in Malaysia, most of the severed and financially-troubled firms are classified as Practice Note 17 (PN17). In order to further harmonize with the Malaysian market environment, loss-making companies are also considered to have high probability to face financial distress.…”
Section: Hypothesis 1cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If they have good corporate governance and have high concern on improving governance, the company may prefer to use big accounting firm (Lina & Liub 2009;and Houqe, Zijl, Dunstan, & Karim 2015). State-owned enteprise ("BUMN") …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%