2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2014.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of cognitive training and mental stimulation on cognitive and everyday functioning of healthy older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Memory and subjective cognitive performance might be improved by training in group versus individual settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
277
4
21

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 382 publications
(313 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
11
277
4
21
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of group cognitive stimulation activities for healthy elderly individuals was also reported in a recently-published systematic review and meta-analyis. 29 Although the present study did not achieve statistically significant improvements for the cognitive domains of attention, memory, verbal fluency, language and executive functions, there was a discreet improvement in these domains when comparing the values recorded before and after the intervention. The participants of the present study were active, healthy individuals, who recorded high scores for cognitive performance in the pre-test, which may have affected these results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…The value of group cognitive stimulation activities for healthy elderly individuals was also reported in a recently-published systematic review and meta-analyis. 29 Although the present study did not achieve statistically significant improvements for the cognitive domains of attention, memory, verbal fluency, language and executive functions, there was a discreet improvement in these domains when comparing the values recorded before and after the intervention. The participants of the present study were active, healthy individuals, who recorded high scores for cognitive performance in the pre-test, which may have affected these results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Além disso, a condução do treino em grupo ofereceria a vantagem de alcançar um maior número de participantes do grupo experimental em menor tempo. A literatura internacional já disponibiliza alguns resultados comparativos entre a modalidade coletiva e individual de intervenção (ver Kelly et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…: Hertzgov et al, 2009;Shubert, Strobach, & Karbach, 2014 Em relação à eficácia dos estudos, houve uma dificuldade de alcançar conclusões robustas para esse critério nos estudos de revisão, pois nota-se que o campo de pesquisa nacional ainda não dispõe de um consenso sobre os critérios para se avaliar a eficácia de um treino. Alguns estudos baseiam-se na observação de diferenças significativas nas médias (ou deltas) entre pré e pós-teste em uma análise intragrupo, outros baseiamse em análises mais confiáveis para esse fim, como a análise de variância e os efeitos de interação entre o momento e o grupo, este último critério predominantemente adotado na literatura internacional (Kelly et al, 2014). Outros, ainda, apoiam-se em critérios como aproximação da significância estatística ou observação das médias de desempenho para inferir sobre os efeitos do treino.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations