2006
DOI: 10.1207/s15324834basp2801_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Cognitive Styles on Authoritarianism Based Conservatism and Racism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, analogous to NFSS, the effects of the new Decisiveness scale on the target variables were transmitted through social attitudes, and the results therefore show that the mediation model proposed Chirumbolo (2002), Cornelis and Van Hiel (2006), Crowson et al (2005), and Van Hiel et al (2004) is applicable to the present data. In sum, the new Decisiveness scale has much more in common with NFSS than the original Decisiveness scale.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Moreover, analogous to NFSS, the effects of the new Decisiveness scale on the target variables were transmitted through social attitudes, and the results therefore show that the mediation model proposed Chirumbolo (2002), Cornelis and Van Hiel (2006), Crowson et al (2005), and Van Hiel et al (2004) is applicable to the present data. In sum, the new Decisiveness scale has much more in common with NFSS than the original Decisiveness scale.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Moreover, NFC is considered an important motivational-cognitive basis for authority-and tradition-based ideologies (see Jost et al, 2003;Roets & Van Hiel, 2011a). Many correlational studies have supported the notion that RWA is more strongly endorsed by persons high in dispositional NFC (Cornelis & Van Hiel, 2006;Dhont, Roets, & Van Hiel 2013;Onraet, et al, 2011;Roets & Van Hiel, 2006;Roets et al, 2012). Moreover, the claim that epistemic motives are indeed an important source of authoritarianism is supported by experimental research showing that situationally induced NFC evokes a wide range of typical expressions of authoritarianism such as the rejection of opinion deviates (Kruglanksi & Webster, 1991), increased conformity (Kruglanksi, Webster & Klem, 1993) and the development of an autocratic leadership structure in groups (Pierro, Mannetti, De Grada, Livi, & Kruglanski, 2003).…”
Section: Need For Closure As a Motivational Source Of Right-wing Authmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In general, those relatively higher in conservatism score more highly on prejudice towards various racial outgroups (e.g., Cornelis & Van Hiel, 2006;Franssen, Dhont, & Van Hiel, 2013;Hodson & Busseri, 2012;Sidanius, Pratto, & Bobo, 1996), immigrants (Hodson, Choma, et al, 2013), and the homeless . Conservatism, particularly social-cultural conservatism, proves an especially strong predictor of anti-gay attitudes , with a meta-analytic r = .42 (Whitley & Lee, 2000; see our Table 2).…”
Section: Conservatismmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Relatedly, Wilson (1973) operationalised conservatism as "a generalized susceptibility to experiencing threat or anxiety in the face of uncertainty" (p. 259). As such, those higher in conservatism, particularly social or cultural (vs. economic) conservatism, 2 are predisposed towards prejudicial orientations regarding lower status outgroups (see Cornelis & Van Hiel, 2006;Dhont & Hodson, 2014a;Hodson, 2014). Cast in contemporary terms, the "core ideology of conservatism stresses resistance to change and justification [or acceptance] of inequality" (Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski, & Sulloway, 2003, p. 339).…”
Section: Conservatismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation