2020
DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1841791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of clinical and psychological factors on asthma control: the experience of a single asthma center in Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anxiety alone and depression alone groups were both associated with worse disease-related questionnaire scores. While the association between anxiety and depression with poorer questionnaire scores has been well described in asthma [ 4 , 12 , 30 ], our findings extend it to difficult asthma, where the evidence is sparse. However, worse questionnaire scores were the only commonality shared between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The anxiety alone and depression alone groups were both associated with worse disease-related questionnaire scores. While the association between anxiety and depression with poorer questionnaire scores has been well described in asthma [ 4 , 12 , 30 ], our findings extend it to difficult asthma, where the evidence is sparse. However, worse questionnaire scores were the only commonality shared between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Together, this highlights that the co-existence of both anxiety and depression has poor implications in difficult asthma, both physically and psychologically. Indeed, most other studies investigating the impact of psychological comorbidities in asthma of varying severity have focussed on anxiety and depression in combination, which is associated with poorer outcomes [ 4 , 5 , 8 , 9 , 12 , 30 ]. Additionally, our study of biologics use in WATCH found that these psychological comorbidities were associated with a poor biologics response [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acceptable internal consistency of the LOT-R was reported as Cronbach’s α of 0.82 ( Shifren and Anzaldi, 2018 ) in the stroke population, and stability (test–retest reliability) over a 4-month period in college students was reported as r = 0.79 ( Scheier et al, 1994 ). A scoring range of 0 to 13 points indicates a low level of optimism, whereas a range of 14 to 18 points suggests moderate optimism, and 19 to 24 points signifies a high level of optimism ( Przybyszowski et al, 2022 ). In this study, the scale demonstrated good reliability with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.79.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%