The	Impact of Changes in the World Ranking Methodologies on University Positions

Trostyanskaya, Irina B.; Polikhina, Nadezhda A.

doi:10.31857/s013216250001960-9

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As this approach showed, however, exterior ranking systems were not the only way to approach ranking. Indeed, the spread of the World Wide Web provided institutions with an opportunity to improve their own outlook through fair assessment by putting the power of ranking in the hands of the consumer and following the standard approach (Trostyanskaya & Polikhina, 2018;Jarocka, 2015;Muiruri, 2017;Mukhwana et al, 2016;Meredith, 2018;Tosun, 2019;Shahjahan et al, 2020;Trinidad et al, 2021).…”

Section: Results Constrictionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

SEM Model Analysis on the Effect of Antecedents of the University of Nairobi and Jiangsu University’s Academic Quality within the Higher Education Institutions

Thige¹,

Li²,

William³

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study is guided specific errand on a dissimilar dataset as in previous study but integrated in way of objective and approach. The study harmonizes the structural estimations concocted in previous studies concerning the impact, relations and associations of and/or amid the five main parameters to and/or amid the academic quality while addressing assortments of micro but different objectives under this errand. Since the previous studies aimed at explicating the comparative significance, directions and correlational characteristics of UJS & UON's, the current study as partly an extrapolation for this: 1) does robustness diagnostics for the impacts and directions identified towards academic quality in previous study as well as affirming the consistency of the result; 2) innovatively implicates anew objective of the study when the paired homologous structural departments are implicated into the mediation and moderation relation effects, and how the integrative change the academic quality of their respective universities; 3) thirdly, the study integrates into new objective when their inter-correlational and analogous comparison is made to identify their temporal similarities and differences while addressing the gap and variance for academic development policy formulation.

show abstract

Section: Results Constrictionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

SEM Model Analysis on the Effect of Antecedents of the University of Nairobi and Jiangsu University’s Academic Quality within the Higher Education Institutions

Thige¹,

Li²,

William³

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Ranking assessment of the competitiveness of agricultural universities

Klochkov

Akri

Samorukov

et al. 2019

IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ranking is one of the tools for assessing the competitiveness of universities. There are regional and world rankings of agricultural universities and agricultural sciences. The QS World University Rankings is one of the most influential global university rankings. Only universities that offer all levels of education are included in the QS rating: bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral degrees (or postgraduate studies in Russian practice). At the same time, the university should comprise at least two of the five areas of knowledge: the humanities and arts; engineering and technical sciences; natural sciences; medicine and life sciences; social sciences and management. Evaluation of the best universities in the world in the ranking is based on six criteria: academic reputation (an indicator based on a survey of professors and teachers); reputation among employers (invitations to participate in the survey are sent to companies of all industries ranging in size from one hundred employees and above); the ratio of teaching staff to the number of students (the source of this data is information provided by the universities themselves); citation index (the ratio of the number of published scientific publications to the number of teachers and researchers for whom the university is the main place of work for at least one semester); the proportion of foreign students (reflects the degree of attractiveness of an educational institution in the international arena); the proportion of foreign teachers and scientists (employees who have worked for at least three months, taking into account the percentage of the rate, are taken into account). The article analyzes the methodology of the QS World University Rankings by Subject: Agriculture & Forestry and Veterinary Science. The author gives an assessment of the best universities according to the rating agency QS. The results of this study can be used by top management of agricultural universities in the designing of growth strategy.

show abstract

The Impact of Changes in the World Ranking Methodologies on University Positions

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

SEM Model Analysis on the Effect of Antecedents of the University of Nairobi and Jiangsu University’s Academic Quality within the Higher Education Institutions

SEM Model Analysis on the Effect of Antecedents of the University of Nairobi and Jiangsu University’s Academic Quality within the Higher Education Institutions

Ranking assessment of the competitiveness of agricultural universities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About