2019
DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of anti‐consumption on consumer well‐being

Abstract: Although consumption is a symbol of an individual's socio‐economic status, an increasing number of individuals voluntarily prefer to consume less. This phenomenon is called anti‐consumption and it mainly occurs in developed countries where consumption levels have reached excessive amounts. One of the main aims of individuals following an anti‐consumption lifestyle is to increase their own well‐being. However, researchers have yet to investigate whether anti‐consumption, indeed, leads to greater positive consum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue at hand herein is whether observers are readily able to understand those expressions. Lee and Ahn () and Oral and Thurner () find links between anticonsumption practices and increased well‐being despite the established link between consumption and symbolic benefits, suggesting that there could be ways to garner symbolic benefits without physical consumption resulting in increased well‐being. This study suggests that conspicuous anticonsumption is a mechanism to deliver these symbolic and self‐expressive benefits to more consumers, a nudge that can encourage anticonsumption behaviors at a large scale rather than simply preaching to the choir.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue at hand herein is whether observers are readily able to understand those expressions. Lee and Ahn () and Oral and Thurner () find links between anticonsumption practices and increased well‐being despite the established link between consumption and symbolic benefits, suggesting that there could be ways to garner symbolic benefits without physical consumption resulting in increased well‐being. This study suggests that conspicuous anticonsumption is a mechanism to deliver these symbolic and self‐expressive benefits to more consumers, a nudge that can encourage anticonsumption behaviors at a large scale rather than simply preaching to the choir.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, there is a need for psychological, cultural and behavioural changes in consumption to improve environmental, social and individual well-being (Brown & Kasser, 2005;Deliana & Rum, 2019;Markowitz & Bowerman, 2011). As an example, some experiments on decreasing materialism have been associated with an increased feeling of personal security and the encouragement of intrinsic values (Atik et al, 2020;Kasser, 2016;Oral & Thurner, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship is stressed in various studies (Alexander and Ussher 2012;Anderson and Heyne 2016;Boujbel and D'Astous 2012;Kang et al 2021). For Oral and Thurner (2019), high control over consumption has no significant positive impact on consumer well-being, neither a broad scope of concerns. However, anti-consumption attitudes produce positive feelings and happiness compared to pro-consumption attitudes (Iyer and Muncy 2016).…”
Section: Minimalism and Happinessmentioning
confidence: 99%