2020
DOI: 10.1515/cercles-2020-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of a peer-facilitated discussion initiative on international students’ learning experience in the context of internationalisation at home

Abstract: Fostering skills development is one of the tenets of education. For a long time, the traditional binary teacher-student interaction was used as the sole approach to teaching and learning but it is now overwhelmingly regarded as insufficient. The present paper reports on an initiative based on the principles of peer learning. The discussion groups and one-to-one sessions in languages, facilitated by native speakers (NS) who are international students in the institution, were set-up to enable language learners t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Digital collaboration-defined as occurrences in which "individuals are responsible for their actions, including learning and respecting the abilities and contribution of their peers" (Laal & Ghodsi, 2012, p. 486) -is a valuable instructional approach that can help students make deeper meaning of content. Student-student interaction in asynchronous, online discussions and, specifically, in student-led discussions, can foster collaborative knowledge construction because active facilitation requires a stronger focus on building upon others' contributions and offering new ideas (De Wever et al, 2010;Jeanneau & O'Riordan, 2020). Contrary to instructor-led discussion, student-led discussion is based on lateral relationships (peer-to-peer), not on a hierarchical relationship (e.g., expert-novice) (Hew, 2005), and when students facilitate discussions, they usually engage in leadership by taking on meaningful facilitation roles (Baran & Correia, 2009).…”
Section: Collaborative Student-led Online Discussion and Cognitive Skillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital collaboration-defined as occurrences in which "individuals are responsible for their actions, including learning and respecting the abilities and contribution of their peers" (Laal & Ghodsi, 2012, p. 486) -is a valuable instructional approach that can help students make deeper meaning of content. Student-student interaction in asynchronous, online discussions and, specifically, in student-led discussions, can foster collaborative knowledge construction because active facilitation requires a stronger focus on building upon others' contributions and offering new ideas (De Wever et al, 2010;Jeanneau & O'Riordan, 2020). Contrary to instructor-led discussion, student-led discussion is based on lateral relationships (peer-to-peer), not on a hierarchical relationship (e.g., expert-novice) (Hew, 2005), and when students facilitate discussions, they usually engage in leadership by taking on meaningful facilitation roles (Baran & Correia, 2009).…”
Section: Collaborative Student-led Online Discussion and Cognitive Skillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socio-cultural integration is also promoted by events that stimulate intercultural exchange, organized by the university, where students can learn about the culture of the language being studied, share their knowledge and experience, and expand their social circle. Other studies also highlight the importance of the role of social interaction in the process of integrating students into the university's educational process under the conditions of distance learning-communication with classmates and teachers, the opportunity to ask for help or advice is extremely important for foreign students, otherwise, isolation can lead to feelings of loneliness and anxiety [46,58] . Thus, our findings are consistent with the recommendations of Dursun and Sevim on the need to assist foreign students in integrating into a new environment [59] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%