2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2006.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact and management of cognitive gap in high performance product development organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from the case study are in line with KAI findings about cognitive style differences in participants' idea generation (Kirton, 2006;Jablokow & Booth, 2006) and map structural representations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The results from the case study are in line with KAI findings about cognitive style differences in participants' idea generation (Kirton, 2006;Jablokow & Booth, 2006) and map structural representations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Cognitive psychologists and other researchers use the term cognitive gap to describe these differences in cognitive level and/or cognitive style that can appear as any one of the following variations 6,14 . 14 .…”
Section: Cognitive Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in-line with the Organizational Knowledge Creation (OKC) theory by Nonaka & Takeuchi (1995) and further study by Nonaka, Toyama & Byosiere (2001) and Von Krogh et al, (2000). Other scholars, Jablokow and Booth (2006) noted that, the competitive advantage of a company can be linked to two key factors; the ability to generate new intellectual property that offers superior value to customers and the ability to capitalize on it quickly.…”
Section: Knowledge Quality (Kq)mentioning
confidence: 99%