The Illuminator of Bodleian Library ms. Selden Supra 38 and his Working Methods

Bartal, Renana

doi:10.1484/j.pecia.1.100961

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…41 When any fish morbidity or mortality is observed outside an aquaculture facility within 96 hours of the deposit of a drug or pest control product, a fishery officer must be notified. 42 An aquaculture operation cannot be restocked if the concentration of free sulfide exceeds prescribed concentration limits, or if the seabed is covered in bacteria and marine worms beyond a prescribed level. 43 When these limits are exceeded, the Minister must be notified.…”

Section: Aquaculture Regulation In Canadamentioning

confidence: 99%

Farming the Sea, a False Solution to a Real Problem: Critical Reflections on Canada’s Aquaculture Regulations

Lee¹,

Repentigny²

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p>Given the dismal state of world fisheries and their continuing decline — exacerbated by climate change — aquaculture is touted by some to be a promising means for fulfilling the growing global demand for seafood, as reflected in its rapid growth as a segment of the global food system. However, large-scale aquaculture presents a complex set of environmental and social issues, and the introduction of genetically engineered fish and seafood add a further layer of complexity to the already contentious nature of conventional aquaculture practices.</p> <p>This article is a critical analysis of aquaculture regulation in Canada. In addition to setting out some of the major issues posed by industrialized aquaculture, it argues that shifting the “production” of seafood from marine fisheries to aquaculture merely shifts the cause of environmental damages. Further, in the context of food security, large-scale aquaculture is an inadequate and oversimplified solution to the problems raised by coastal and Indigenous populations’ reliance on declining fisheries resources. Specifically, using two case studies, this paper criticizes the overreliance within the current system on dominant risk paradigms, which are often closely informed by science. Yet, the relationship between law and science is fraught with tensions, as the two have notably different priorities and methods. In rethinking the role of aquaculture in natural marine resource management, especially in a changing climate, it is important to ensure that careful regard is given to the socio-cultural factors, inequities, and environmental degradation that are inherent in the production of seafood.</p>

show abstract

Section: Aquaculture Regulation In Canadamentioning

confidence: 99%