2015
DOI: 10.5603/piap.2015.0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The IGRA Tests: Where Are We Now?

Abstract: In the early 1990s, WHO declared TB a global emergency [...]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, this assay is less susceptible to false-positive results from BCG inoculation or NTM infection and is more sensitive than the TST for patients who are immunosuppressed and children (7,8). However, the IGRA cannot distinguish latent from active TB (9). Neither the TST nor IGRA measures the infection, but rather the immunological memory, which can result from current or past active TB or from subclinical infection resulting in LTBI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this assay is less susceptible to false-positive results from BCG inoculation or NTM infection and is more sensitive than the TST for patients who are immunosuppressed and children (7,8). However, the IGRA cannot distinguish latent from active TB (9). Neither the TST nor IGRA measures the infection, but rather the immunological memory, which can result from current or past active TB or from subclinical infection resulting in LTBI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients with a history of pulmonary tuberculosis, 14.3% of Xpert MTB/RIF positive patients were culture negative and potentially false-positive [ 7 ]. In addition, some methods cannot distinguish active TB (ATB) from LTBI [e.g., interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs)] [ 10 ]. It is challenging to differentiate ATB from LTBI and other respiratory diseases, and misdiagnosis often occurs [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%