2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-2166(01)00007-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0
43

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
98
0
43
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because, for approval of phenomenon as a metaphor; it should have subject, resource and characteristics (reason) considered to be attributed from resource to subject (Forceville, 2002). For instance, "academic writing is like being in a contest, I am behind the group that doesn't know where the front is" (Armstrong, 2008).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because, for approval of phenomenon as a metaphor; it should have subject, resource and characteristics (reason) considered to be attributed from resource to subject (Forceville, 2002). For instance, "academic writing is like being in a contest, I am behind the group that doesn't know where the front is" (Armstrong, 2008).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carroll, unlike Kennedy and Whittock, moreover argues that visual metaphors differ from verbal ones in often allowing for reversal of target and source. In Forceville (2002a), expanding on earlier work (Forceville 1988(Forceville , 1994(Forceville , 1995(Forceville , 1996(Forceville , 2000, I in turn question Carroll's choice for visual 1 The topic of metaphor and music also has inspired studies over the past few years, but for lack of expertise in this area I will not dwell on these. For references, see Johnson and Larson 2003; see also Cook 1998, Zbikowski 2002, Thorau 2003, and Spitzer 2004the last one rather difficult for laymen.…”
Section: Multimodality Versus Monomodalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three basic elements are mentioned that are important in developing a metaphor relationship (Forceville, 2002). These elements are: (1) the subject of metaphor, (2) its source and (3) the characteristics/relationships as reasons for likening the source and the subject of the metaphor.…”
Section: Data Collection Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%