2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The identification of KRAS mutations at codon 12 in plasma DNA is not a prognostic factor in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…KRAS mutations have been found to be related to poor prognosis in several types of malignant disease. In a multivariate analysis, a KRAS mutation in the plasma of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer or colorectal cancer was shown to predict poor OS and a high risk of recurrence [94-96]. APC and TP53 aberrations were found to have high sensitivity and specificity in predicting disease relapse in colorectal cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer and oral squamous-cell carcinoma [97-99].…”
Section: Diagnosis and Prognosis Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KRAS mutations have been found to be related to poor prognosis in several types of malignant disease. In a multivariate analysis, a KRAS mutation in the plasma of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer or colorectal cancer was shown to predict poor OS and a high risk of recurrence [94-96]. APC and TP53 aberrations were found to have high sensitivity and specificity in predicting disease relapse in colorectal cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer and oral squamous-cell carcinoma [97-99].…”
Section: Diagnosis and Prognosis Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have suggested that the detection of plasma mutated KRAS could serve as an alternative to invasive tissue biopsy in establishing prognosis in these patients. However earlier study by Camps et al (2011) using the same technique (qPCR) to detect plasma mutated KRAS showed no significant relationship with overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with advance-stage NSCLC. The opposing outcome between these two studies might be due to methodological differences.…”
Section: Applicability Of Ctdna As a Prognostic Biomarkermentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The opposing outcome between these two studies might be due to methodological differences. Both of these used qPCR to detect mutation, but the earlier study by Camps et al (2011) targeted only two KRAS mutations in codon 12, while the later study interrogated six KRAS mutations in codon 12 thus resulting in increased detection of plasma mutated KRAS (17.5% compared to 8.8% in earlier study). However, the prognostic value and clinical utility of ctDNA in the context of a resectable tumour is very limited.…”
Section: Applicability Of Ctdna As a Prognostic Biomarkermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, in a NSCLC metaanalysis data review of the literature revealed negative correlation of the prognostic impact of RAS mutations mainly in adenocarcinoma cases [89]. While the KRAS mutations in patients with a form of metastatic NSCLC, these patients showed no response to chemotherapy [90,91]. Nevertheless, the response to EGFR TKIs is negatively predicted through KRAS mutations [35,92,93].…”
Section: Krasmentioning
confidence: 99%