2010
DOI: 10.1080/07294360903532016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ideal research‐teaching nexus in the eyes of academics: building profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be explained by a potential overlap between supervisors' conceptions of themselves, research and teaching, on the one hand, and supervisors' values and intentions as expressed through a dilemmatic space, on the other hand (e.g. Brew 2003;Robertson and Bond 2001;Visser-Wijnveen et al 2010). …”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be explained by a potential overlap between supervisors' conceptions of themselves, research and teaching, on the one hand, and supervisors' values and intentions as expressed through a dilemmatic space, on the other hand (e.g. Brew 2003;Robertson and Bond 2001;Visser-Wijnveen et al 2010). …”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results add to earlier work in hard-pure and soft-pure sciences, which concluded that students mainly familiarise themselves with the teachers' research through their courses (van der Rijst et al, 2013;Visser-Wijnveen, van Driel, van der Rijst, Verloop, & Visser, 2010). This can be interpreted in several ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In particular, over the last decade, a significant amount of emic material has been recorded and analyzed in terms of the outcomes of research-teaching linkages across Anglophone and European universities [22]. The Humanities have certainly not been immune to this trend [14,23]. Through our conversations with and as educational developers and researchers we have arguably been reflecting back local customs, meanings, and beliefs, rather than illustrating our material practices and how these might be contradictory or dissonant to our narratives about those practices [24].…”
Section: Plot 1: Excavating the Emic Foundations Of Our Stories: Brinmentioning
confidence: 99%