Present Teaching Stories as Re-Membering the Humanities

Abstract

Abstract:The ways in which Humanities scholars talk about teaching tell something about how we interact with the past of our own discipline as well as anticipate our students' futures. In this we express collective memories as truths of learning and teaching. As cultural artifacts of our present, such stories are worthy of excavation for what they imply about ourselves as well as messages they pass onto our successors. This paper outlines "collective re-membering" as one way to understand these stories, particularly as they present in qualitative interviews commonly being used to research higher education practice in the Humanities. It defines such collective re-membering through an interweaving of Halbwachs, Ricoeur, Wertsch and Bakhtin. It proposes that a dialogic reading between this understanding of collective re-membering and qualitative data-sets enables us to both access our discursive tendencies within the Humanities and understand the impact they might have on student engagement with our disciplines, noting that when discussing learning and teaching, we engage in collectively influenced myth-making and hagiography. The paper finishes by positing that the Humanities need to change their orientation from generating myths and pious teaching sagas towards the complex and ultimately more intellectually satisfying, articulation of learning and teaching parables.

How an Antipodean Perspective of International Schooling Challenges Third Culture Kid (TCK) Conceptualisation

“…Gunn (2014) connects the TCK concept and first-people skills and experiences: teaching Aboriginal culture through traditional stories and storytelling is more important than traditional western teaching techniques to achieve this. Furthermore, learning about Aboriginal culture and lives enhances the wider Australian culture, bringing people together from different cultures.…”

Representing knowledge: Assessment of creativity in humanities

“…To step outside the writing of experts and to reflect on what may be missing in a line of thinking require an openness to consider other viewpoints. This can be encouraged by providing students with opportunities to explore open-ended tasks that step outside the predicted views of personal capacities (Silviac et al., 2009) and allow other ways of seeing and exploring world views to emerge (Gunn, 2014). Lecturers who seek strategies to enhance divergent thinking, within the constructs of academic rigor, can stimulate new ideas and consideration of other ways of knowing.…”

Teaching and learning French – A tale of desire in the humanities

“…Recent publications in the field of the scholarship of teaching and learning urge us to seek out our signature pedagogies and to draw on the disciplinary heart of what makes us learners and teachers in higher education (HE) (Bass and Linkon, 2008; Chick et al., 2009; Shulman, 2005). More ambitious still, Vicky Gunn (2014) encourages us to ‘fly with dragons’ and draws on the promiscuous possibilities our disciplinary backgrounds open up to us as we teach and learn. These soaring aims contrast with the other, predominant discourse that inhabits our academic world, where we are restricted and restrained by a neoliberal agenda in which the humanities (arguably) have no part.…”