2022
DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00030-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The iBreastExam versus clinical breast examination for breast evaluation in high risk and symptomatic Nigerian women: a prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study done by Mango D et al, I Breast Exam and clinical breast examination when used together, reported sensitivity for suspicious masses would improve, but specificity would decrease. They also found better sensitivity and specificity for masses which are suspicious in non dense breasts as compared to dense breasts [15]. Xu and colleagues reported results of breast-i exam were not influenced by breast density [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a study done by Mango D et al, I Breast Exam and clinical breast examination when used together, reported sensitivity for suspicious masses would improve, but specificity would decrease. They also found better sensitivity and specificity for masses which are suspicious in non dense breasts as compared to dense breasts [15]. Xu and colleagues reported results of breast-i exam were not influenced by breast density [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…PEF has been successfully tested in vivo with better sensitivity than mammography and has been shown to be able to detect breast cancers in women with dense breasts that were undetectable via mammography (Xu et al 2016 ). The UELS has licensed the technology and received FDA approval with the PEF breast cancer detector marketed under the trade name intelligent Breast Exam (iBE®) (Mango et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Piezoelectric Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study generated essential data that might be the basis for further research on breast cancer diagnosis, downstaging, and screening in LMICs. Mango and colleagues 6 showed that the iBreastExam performed well, showing superior sensitivity over clinical breast examination for any breast lesion (63%, 95% CI 57-69 vs 31%, 25-37; p<0•0001) and similar sensitivity to clinical breast examination for suspicious lesions (86%, 70-95 vs 83%, 67-94; p=0•65). The findings show that the iBreastExam has potential to bridge some deficiencies and gaps in the decision-making process, especially for community health-care providers.…”
Section: Breast Cancer Screening: Can the Ibreastexam Bridge The Gap?mentioning
confidence: 99%