1993
DOI: 10.1109/71.243525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hyper-deBruijn networks: scalable versatile architecture

Abstract: Both Hypercube and deBruijn networks possess desirable properties. It should be understood, though, that some of the attractive features of one are not found in the other. The architecture proposed in this paper is a combination of these architectures, providing some of the desirable properties of both the networks such as admitting many computationally important networks, flexibility in terms of connections per node as well as level of fault-tolerance. Also the network allows a simple VLSI layout, scalability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the Binary Hypercube (BHC) [8], the Generalized Hypercube (GHC) [12], the Torus [34], the Spanning Bus Hypercube (SBH) [21], the Hierarchical Cubic Network (HCN) [9], the Cube-Connected-Cycle (CCC) [35], the Hyper-deBruijn (HdB) [36], the Folded Peterson (FPT) [37], the Hypermesh (HM) [33], and the Optical Multi-Mesh Hypercube (OMMH) [17]. The comparison parameters include diameter, degree, number of links, average message distance, average traffic density, and queuing delay.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Smlh With Popular Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the Binary Hypercube (BHC) [8], the Generalized Hypercube (GHC) [12], the Torus [34], the Spanning Bus Hypercube (SBH) [21], the Hierarchical Cubic Network (HCN) [9], the Cube-Connected-Cycle (CCC) [35], the Hyper-deBruijn (HdB) [36], the Folded Peterson (FPT) [37], the Hypermesh (HM) [33], and the Optical Multi-Mesh Hypercube (OMMH) [17]. The comparison parameters include diameter, degree, number of links, average message distance, average traffic density, and queuing delay.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Smlh With Popular Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construction of such a product network requires first choosing a base reference, such as de Bruijn networks [2], shuffle-exchange networks [3], and complete binary trees [4]. The base elements may be different [6], [8]. The cross product of interconnection networks outperforms traditional topologies such as mesh and hypercube in diameter, degree, and matching size [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.13 shows how w avelengths are assigned for each P E o f P lane L . The following wavelengths are assigned to the rst row: 1 , 2 , , 8 . Then, 2 , , 8 , 1 are assigned as wavelengths in the second row.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Spanning Multichannel Network Using Wdmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following wavelengths are assigned to the rst row: 1 , 2 , , 8 . Then, 2 , , 8 , 1 are assigned as wavelengths in the second row. In general, wavelength assignment i n a r o w i s a c hieved by rotating the wavelength assignment of the previous row b y one column.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Spanning Multichannel Network Using Wdmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation