The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-585-27268-9_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable Optical Interconnection Networks for Large-Scale Parallel Computers

Abstract: A new scalable interconnection topology called the Spanning Multichannel Linked Hypercube SMLH is proposed along with an optical implementation methodology that combines both the advantages of free space optics with those of wavelength division multiplexing techniques. The SMLH uses the hypercube topology as a basic building block and connects such building blocks using two-dimensional multichannel links similar to spanning buses. In doing so, the SMLH combines positive features of both the hypercube small dia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident that optical crossbar connected cluster network is higher node degree, link complexity, bisection bandwidth, number of links, number of processors, transmission bit rate capacity for audio and video signals, and higher additional network costs than optical hypercube connected cluster network. We have summarized the complete comparison of large scale of our optical interconnection systems with their medium optical interconnection systems [15]. It is clear from the comparison the best performance of our large scale optical interconnection systems in large number of processors and links and transmission bit rate capacity of audio and video signals in both types of optical interconnection networks over medium scale optical interconnection systems as mentioned in the previous studies.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is evident that optical crossbar connected cluster network is higher node degree, link complexity, bisection bandwidth, number of links, number of processors, transmission bit rate capacity for audio and video signals, and higher additional network costs than optical hypercube connected cluster network. We have summarized the complete comparison of large scale of our optical interconnection systems with their medium optical interconnection systems [15]. It is clear from the comparison the best performance of our large scale optical interconnection systems in large number of processors and links and transmission bit rate capacity of audio and video signals in both types of optical interconnection networks over medium scale optical interconnection systems as mentioned in the previous studies.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…viii) Figs. (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) have assured that as number of processors per cluster, number of tunable VCSELs, number of detectors, number of waveguides, number of demultiplexers, and number of clusters increase this result in increasing in network cost in the case of both optical crossbar connected cluster and optical hypercube connected cluster networks. We have indicated that optical crossbar connected cluster network is higher network cost than optical hypercube connected cluster network.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scalability of a network [4], [5] is defined as the property by which the size of the system can be expanded with nominal changes in the existing configuration provided that system expansion results with improvement in performance. The torus embedded hypercube network is highly scalable network.…”
Section: Architectural Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of torus network can be imposed on to the mesh embedded hypercube network [4], [5] to give rise to an embedded architecture [6]- [8] called torus embedded hypercube scalable interconnection network and hence an architectural enhancement of mesh embedded hypercube network.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, hypercube network topology is chosen because of its superior topological characteristics which includes small diameter ( communication delays are less when network's diameter is small), high connectivity, simple routing, and fault tolerance [62]. …”
Section: 1 Prediction Model Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%