2022
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-022-01907-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hydration of fast setting spray binder versus (aluminum sulfate) accelerated OPC

Abstract: The (early) hydration mechanisms of two different binder systems used for shotcrete were investigated: the so far almost unexplored low sulfate binder (spray binder), used in the field of dry-mix shotcrete; and ordinary Portland cement, accelerated by aluminum sulfate, widely used for wet-mix shotcrete. The basis for the fast setting of the spray binder is the rapid dissolution of C3A and the subsequent formation of flaky CO3-AFm phases. Thereby induced high aluminum concentrations in the pore solution lead to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for HCP, the temperature development at the beginning of hydration is similar but strikingly much higher for D800 and D1000, reaching more than ten times the one of OPC. The hydration levels of OPC are well known [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Therefore, the measured temperature curve of OPC corresponds to the generally known stages of hydration.…”
Section: Specific Surface Area Of the Powders And Heat Release During...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for HCP, the temperature development at the beginning of hydration is similar but strikingly much higher for D800 and D1000, reaching more than ten times the one of OPC. The hydration levels of OPC are well known [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Therefore, the measured temperature curve of OPC corresponds to the generally known stages of hydration.…”
Section: Specific Surface Area Of the Powders And Heat Release During...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x > 1 (10) where σ and ε are the stress and strain of UHPSC, respectively, f c and ε c are the peak stress and corresponding strain value of UHPSC under uniaxial compression, α is the shape parameter of the model's ascending section and β is the shape parameter of the model's descending section. The derivative of x = 0 is obtained by taking the first-order derivative of the model's ascending section in Equations ( 8) and (9), and the calculation is as follows:…”
Section: Uniaxial Compressive Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The α and β obtained from Equation ( 12) were substituted into Equation (10), and the stress-strain curves under different steel fiber content were obtained after finishing. The calculated stress-strain curves of UHPSC under uniaxial compression were compared with those measured in the test, as shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Uniaxial Compressive Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation