The Howard Government: The Extent to which Public Attitudes Influenced Australia's Federal Policy Mix

Lewis, Chris

doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00516.x

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

(17 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…During his time in government he shaped much of Australia's defence and foreign policy as well as the nation's identity in international politics. He is also widely regarded as a skillful communicator (Lewis, 2007; McAllister & Bean, 2006; Tiernan, 2006), and his public comments about terrorism have been both influential and prolific in the years following the 9/11 terrorist attack.…”

Section: Appraisal Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Fear Appeals in Political Rhetoric about Terrorism: An Analysis of Speeches by Australian Prime Minister Howard

Castella

McGarty

Musgrove

2009

Political Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

for the presence of statements promoting fearconsistent appraisals . Fear-arousing content was present in 24 of these speeches, but the amount of fear-arousing content varied markedly. In particular, rhetoric that raised doubts about the capacity of Australia and its allies to cope with terrorism was most strongly present in the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq and at times of declining support for government policies. Textual analysis of three key speeches confirmed a marked difference between Howard's speech given immediately after the attacks on September 11, 2001, and the second and third speeches presented prior to and after the 2003 invasion of Iraq. These findings indicate that Howard has not consistently employed fear-inducing rhetoric in his speeches about terrorism, but that particular speeches appear to take this form, raising the possibility that fear-arousing rhetoric may have been selectively deployed to support his political purposes at those times.In the proclaimed "new age" of terrorism-related dangers and concerns, political leaders have increasingly been criticized for manipulating public fears of terrorism to achieve specific political objectives (Altheide, 2003;Furedi,

show abstract

Section: Appraisal Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%