Fear Appeals in Political Rhetoric about Terrorism: An Analysis of Speeches by Australian Prime Minister Howard

Abstract

for the presence of statements promoting fearconsistent appraisals . Fear-arousing content was present in 24 of these speeches, but the amount of fear-arousing content varied markedly. In particular, rhetoric that raised doubts about the capacity of Australia and its allies to cope with terrorism was most strongly present in the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq and at times of declining support for government policies. Textual analysis of three key speeches confirmed a marked difference between Howard's speech given immediately after the attacks on September 11, 2001, and the second and third speeches presented prior to and after the 2003 invasion of Iraq. These findings indicate that Howard has not consistently employed fear-inducing rhetoric in his speeches about terrorism, but that particular speeches appear to take this form, raising the possibility that fear-arousing rhetoric may have been selectively deployed to support his political purposes at those times.In the proclaimed "new age" of terrorism-related dangers and concerns, political leaders have increasingly been criticized for manipulating public fears of terrorism to achieve specific political objectives (Altheide, 2003;Furedi,

Justifying discrimination against Muslim immigrants: Out‐group ideology and the five‐step social identity model

“…These threats can take different forms but have in common the danger of what ‘the other’ supposedly means for what ‘we’ believe in and the way in which ‘we’ live our lives. This means that political leaders can work up threatening versions of Islam to justify violent actions and exclusionary measures (e.g., De Castella, McGarty, & Musgrove, 2009; Wood & Finlay, 2008).…”

Affective Priming in Political Campaigns: How Campaign-Induced Emotions Prime Political Opinions

“…As documented by content analytic studies (e.g., De Castella, McGarty, & Musgrove, 2009;Jerit, 2004), emotions are in fact a pervasive element of political communication used by political candidates and parties to win the attention and approval of the public. The attitudinal ramifications of emotional appeals in political campaigns are yet barely incorporated in the classical conceptualizations of campaign effects (i.e., the priming and framing perspective).…”

Prime Ministerial Rhetoric and Recession Politics: Meaning Making in Economic Crisis Management

“…Ours is an explorative study of prime ministerial rhetoric of which, in comparison to presidential rhetoric, we know comparatively little. This is not to say that no prior work of this kind has been done (Reicher and Hopkins 1996; Gaffney 2001; Seymour‐Ure 2003; Curran 2004; DeCastella et al 2009), but that we are only beginning to explore the full implications of the emerging ‘rhetorical premiership’ (Helms 2008; Toye 2010). More recently, Christopher Hood and colleagues' work on blame management as a ‘staged retreat' has begun to fill some of this void (Hood et al 2009).…”