2007
DOI: 10.1086/509256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Host Galaxies and Environment of Chandra ‐Selected Active Galactic Nuclei in the Deep ACS GTO Cluster Fields

Abstract: We present catalogs and images of optical counterparts to the Chandra-selected X-ray sources found in the fields of the five clusters RX J0152À1357, RX J0849+4452, RDCS J0910+5422, MS 1054À0321, and RDCS J1252À2927, which were imaged with the Advanced Camera for Surveys as part of the ACS Guaranteed Time Observer programs. A total of 98 X-ray sources fall within the ACS mosaics, and positive identifications are made for $96% of them, including confirmed cluster members. We classify the sources as active galact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that a third (4/12) of our cluster IR-AGNs are also known X-ray sources (Martel et al 2007;Johnson et al 2003), a fraction that is nominally consistent with results from the AGN and Galaxy Evolution Survey (AGES) where ∼50% of IR-AGNs are also X-ray sources ). However, it is worth mentioning here that X-ray flux limits are not the same among these studies, and so agreement on this ratio is not necessarily implied.…”
Section: Cluster Ir-agn Propertiessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We find that a third (4/12) of our cluster IR-AGNs are also known X-ray sources (Martel et al 2007;Johnson et al 2003), a fraction that is nominally consistent with results from the AGN and Galaxy Evolution Survey (AGES) where ∼50% of IR-AGNs are also X-ray sources ). However, it is worth mentioning here that X-ray flux limits are not the same among these studies, and so agreement on this ratio is not necessarily implied.…”
Section: Cluster Ir-agn Propertiessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This cluster shows signs of having gone through a large-scale merger event recently as indicated by its X-ray emission, luminosity distribution, and weak-lensing profile (Jee et al 2005a). We detect two IR-AGNs in this cluster, both of which are classified as X-ray QSOs (Martel et al 2007); no other cluster galaxies are detected as X-ray sources. One of the IR+X-ray AGNs is about 800 kpc from the cluster core while the second appears to be in a merging system.…”
Section: Rx J0152-13mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is evidence in a number of other studies (e.g., Ruderman & Ebeling 2005;Martini et al 2007;Martel et al 2007;Fassbender et al 2012) that AGN show a preference for the inner regions of massive clusters, at halo masses larger than the X-ZENS values, and that AGNs may possibly be associated with the brightest cluster members. There are however other studies which report opposite results, i.e., even possible AGN excesses in the outskirts of galaxy clusters (e.g., Gilmour et al 2009;Pentericci et al 2013).…”
Section: Agn Hosts: Centrals Inner Satellites or Outer Satellites?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A value of 99 has been assigned to unavailable photometry. The last column gives the morphological T-type (de Vaucouleurs et al 1976) of the galaxy, as determined by Postman et al (2005). upper right side of the plot, marked with a square, corresponds to an X-ray source at the cluster redshift (ID 174; see Rosati et al 2004;Martel et al 2007). Note the unusual morphology of this source (see Fig.…”
Section: Vlt Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%