The hole in the doughnut: a study of police discretion in a nightlife setting

Abstract

online with the title: The hole in the doughnut: a study of police discretion in a nightlife setting http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10. 1080/10439463.2014 The hole in the doughnut: a study of police discretion in a nightlife setting Kristin Buvik THE HOLE IN THE DOUGHNUT: A STUDY OF POLICE DISCRETION IN A NIGHTLIFE SETTING AbstractPolicing is permeated by situations in which discretion is most important. A substantial part of police work in the nightlife setting involves management of drunk and disorderly patrons, and police officers operate with considerable discretion. The aim of this paper is to explore patterns of decision-making and to identify factors that influence an officer's use of discretion in nightlife settings. The data were collected during fieldwork with patrolling police on weekend nights in Oslo and from interviews with police officers.This study provides insight into the everyday work of police officers in Oslo. The officers mostly manage a number of minor incidents, such as disorderly behaviour and alcohol-related trivialities. Police officers generally ignore many minor incidents and seek to resolve cases in the easiest way possible, which implies under-enforcement of the law.Discretionary assessments depend on situational variables, system variables, and offender variables. This paper reveals the importance of these variables and argues that we need to include officer variables as well to get a fuller picture of street-level police officers' decisionmaking. Lipsky's theory of street-level bureaucrats describes how discretionary assessments are based on human judgement, personal decisions and normative choices. Similarly, police officer characteristics involving individual norms and moral beliefs are an important part of discretionary decision-making.

Nightlife Partnership Policing - (Dis)trust Building Between Bouncers and the Police in the War on Gangs

“…Traditionally, research on nightlife policing has focused either on the work and practices of police officers (Buvik, 2014) or on the regulatory practices of bouncers (see Hobbs et al, 2003;Monaghan, 2002). With the exception of Rigakos' analysis of the use of police-for-hire at venues in Halifax 2008and a recent study of how emerging police-bouncer collaboration in the Netherlands affects bouncers' involvement in the policing of (public) nightlife spaces (van Liempt & van Aalst, 2016), researchers have devoted little attention to police-bouncer collaboration.…”

(Cr)immigrant framing in border areas: decision-making processes of Dutch border police officers

“…Observations were combined with brief conversations and on-site informal 'interviews' and discussions with officers: non-structured talks that naturally occurred during observations. Such participant observation in a 'natural' setting combined with interviews and discussions has proven to be a valuable research method to capture both the actions of people and the underlying reasons for the decisions that are made (Quinton 2011, Loftus 2015, De Maillard et al 2016, Buvik 2016.…”

Taking the Path of Least Resistance? Decision-Making in Police Investigations of Illegal Wildlife Trade

“…Within police research, the term "discretion" typically refers to patrol officers making inarticulable judgements prior to a decision or action (Holmberg 2000;Quinton 2011;Buvik 2014;Rowe 2007). Although less commonly described, discretion is also central in police investigation and prosecution (Belur et al 2015;Corsianos 2003;Hald and Rønn 2013) and used in considering whether a crime has been committed, if there are grounds for investigation and prosecution, when interpreting findings (McCoy 1996), and when deciding the appropriate criminal charge (Albonetti 1987).…”