2009
DOI: 10.1891/1540-4153.7.3.130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hispanic Epidemiological Paradox in the Fastest-Growing State in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(27 reference statements)
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found moderate heterogeneity for the meta-analyses comparing white women with class II (I 2 = 61%) and III (I 2 = 53%) obesity to those with a normal BMI (Supplementary Figure 3). With the exception of two studies (15, 45), the effect measures from all studies were consistent with the combined estimate of the odds ratio for the class II obesity category; omission of either of these two studies did not change the inference for this meta-analysis. For the class III obesity category, only the odds ratio estimate from Yang et al (45) was not consistent with the combined odds ratio, and omission of this study did not change the results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We found moderate heterogeneity for the meta-analyses comparing white women with class II (I 2 = 61%) and III (I 2 = 53%) obesity to those with a normal BMI (Supplementary Figure 3). With the exception of two studies (15, 45), the effect measures from all studies were consistent with the combined estimate of the odds ratio for the class II obesity category; omission of either of these two studies did not change the inference for this meta-analysis. For the class III obesity category, only the odds ratio estimate from Yang et al (45) was not consistent with the combined odds ratio, and omission of this study did not change the results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…With the exception of two studies (15, 45), the effect measures from all studies were consistent with the combined estimate of the odds ratio for the class II obesity category; omission of either of these two studies did not change the inference for this meta-analysis. For the class III obesity category, only the odds ratio estimate from Yang et al (45) was not consistent with the combined odds ratio, and omission of this study did not change the results. Meta-regression suggested study type as a possible source of heterogeneity ( P < 0.001) for this BMI category.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In an attempt to shed light on this paradox, studies have shown that despite lower socioeconomic status and access to health care, Hispanics are more likely to report beneficial health behaviors, such as less violence and less smoking, that aid in protection from adverse health outcomes (Yang et al 2009). Further, "social and cultural factors contributing to the paradox are maintained by community networks {or} informal systems of prenatal care that are composed of family, friends, community members and health care workers."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%