The hill-monroe inventory for predicting acceptability for psychotherapy in the institutionalized narcotic addict

Monroe, Jack J.; Hill, Harris E.

doi:10.1002/1097-4679(195801)14:1<31::aid-jclp2270140110>3.0.co;2-o

Cited by 30 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, post hoc intercorrelation of psychometric data available on patients and aides with the performance measures showed that (a) patients' scores on several LPI admissions battery scales correlated significantly with their self-disclosures in the interview, for example, the "acceptability for psychotherapy" (AP) scale (Monroe & Hill, 1958) correlated .52 with self-disclosure (p<.0l); aides' test scores, on the other hand, were unrelated to patient disclosures; (b) test scores of both participants were unrelated to the number of areas explored in the interview.…”

Section: Postexperimental Ratingsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Relation of the A-B distinction and trust-distrust sets to addict patients' self-disclosures in brief interviews.

Berzins¹,

Ross²,

Cohen³

1970

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a study of interpersonal and situational determinants of self-disclosure in "resistive" patients, psychiatric aides conducted brief interviews with hospitalized narcotics addicts. Participants' A-B status and patients' preinterview sets to "trust" (TFH) or "distrust" (DHH) the aide comprised the manipulated factors in a 2 X 2 X 2 design (N = 40 male dyads). As expected, A-type aides with DHH patients and B-type aides with TFH patients obtained better patient self-disclosure in "personal" (as vs. neutral) topical areas than oppositely paired dyads (p < .0005). DHH patients were also more disclosing than TFH 5s (p < .005). These results partially confirm prior therapy analogue studies involving the A-B variable. An expectancy-disconfirmation explanation of the DHH-TFH effects was advanced.

show abstract

Section: Postexperimental Ratingsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Relation of the A-B distinction and trust-distrust sets to addict patients' self-disclosures in brief interviews.

Berzins¹,

Ross²,

Cohen³

1970

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is this latter view which seems to have been daninant in both research and treatment. The thrust of numerous investigations of opiate addiction has been to delineate differences between addicts and nonaddicts using standard personality tests (e.g., Rorschach, TAT, MMPI, 16PF, I-E scale, EPPS, CPI)l or questionnaires developed strict~y for use with addicts (Cavior, Kurtzberg & Lipton 1967;Monroe & Hill 1958;Haertzen et al 1970;Resnick, Firik & Freedman 1970;Haertzen & Hooks 1969). Sane authors (Sutker 1971;Gilbert & I.anbardi 1967) propose that there is a unique constellation of personality characteristics that predisposes an individual to addiction.…”

Section: Chaptermentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of Delayed Rewards, Social Pressure, and Frustration on the Responses of Opiate Addicts

Cj¹

1979

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Monroe-Hill Inventory (77) has been reported in another study as showing successful prediction of acceptability for psychotherapy in narcotic addicts. The Monroe-Hill Inventory (77) has been reported in another study as showing successful prediction of acceptability for psychotherapy in narcotic addicts.…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

Psychotherapy

Lubrosky¹

1959

Annu. Rev. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Just before the writing of this review, a three-day conference, "Confer ence on Research in Psychotherapy," sponsored by the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association, took place. Thirty participants were present, representing approximately seventeen psycho therapy research projects. While the contents of this conference will not be covered (since a book-length summary of it will appear within the next year), it provided an excellent up-to-date overview of psychotherapy re search. Some of the ideas in the present review were derived from this conference.The main first impression one gets from the conference and from re viewing the literature and searching for trends is of bewildering variety: every one is going his merry way. The contributions during the year 1957-58 are a museum of method and philosophy of science. If we classify the types of research according to Helen Sargent's scheme [Wallerstein et al. (120) ], they range all the way from exploratory to rigidly experimental. Not only do they differ in method but in aim, in the segment of psychotherapy focussed upon, and even in whether they focus on psychotherapy aca demically as a facet of personality research, or whether they focus on it clinically with the aim of learning how to help patients get better.Not only does variety in research studies make trends difficult to see clearly but the fi eld itself is one in which not much change can be expected in a period as short as a year. One might be better able to d iscern definite trends in a five-or ten-year period. Finally, a summary of the work of the past year inevitably focuses our attention on what is novel, and it becomes too easy to mistake novelty for progress. Older contributions often have more to teach us than the newer ones. Without a doubt, most of what we know about psychotherapy was presented in the work of Freud, and we have yet to learn how best to use the fruit of his excellent observations.Despite the diversity, on close inspection trends are apparent. This year, as in recent years, the methods of research and the concepts applied to research have become more sophisticated and appropriate to the problems in the field. Better tools are available. A number of n ew syst The survey of the literature in this review was completed in May, 1958. It covers the period from April, 1957, to April, 1958. 2 I wish to express my indebtedness to Drs. Gardner Murphy and Robert Waller stein for their critical reading of the manuscript and to Dr. Helen Sargent for both her reading of the manuscript and discussion of ideas. Acknowledgement is made to Mrs. Ruth Paige for her conscientious culling of the literature, and to Miss Vesta Walker, Librarian, Menninger Foundation Library, for her assistance in the use of library facilities. 317 Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1959.10:317-344. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org Access provided by Western Michigan University on 02/03/15. For personal use only. Quick links to online content Further ANNUAL REVIEWS 318 LUBORSKY terns have been devel...

show abstract

The hill-monroe inventory for predicting acceptability for psychotherapy in the institutionalized narcotic addict

Cited by 30 publications

References 4 publications

Relation of the A-B distinction and trust-distrust sets to addict patients' self-disclosures in brief interviews.

Relation of the A-B distinction and trust-distrust sets to addict patients' self-disclosures in brief interviews.

The Effects of Delayed Rewards, Social Pressure, and Frustration on the Responses of Opiate Addicts

Psychotherapy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About