2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2017.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘healthy worker effect’: Do healthy people climb the occupational ladder?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, because the job market selects individuals with greater muscular capacity and sensory ability to occupy the most insecure and unhealthy positions. Those who have not suffered the effects of work exposure or the adverse events of life, generally younger, will have more opportunities in this type of selection process 24 , 25 . The so-called healthy worker effect expresses this selection bias, that is, those who lost the ability to face the demands of strength, vigilance, and agility did not “survive” in the job market, as they are sick or retired earlier 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, because the job market selects individuals with greater muscular capacity and sensory ability to occupy the most insecure and unhealthy positions. Those who have not suffered the effects of work exposure or the adverse events of life, generally younger, will have more opportunities in this type of selection process 24 , 25 . The so-called healthy worker effect expresses this selection bias, that is, those who lost the ability to face the demands of strength, vigilance, and agility did not “survive” in the job market, as they are sick or retired earlier 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who have not suffered the effects of work exposure or the adverse events of life, generally younger, will have more opportunities in this type of selection process 24 , 25 . The so-called healthy worker effect expresses this selection bias, that is, those who lost the ability to face the demands of strength, vigilance, and agility did not “survive” in the job market, as they are sick or retired earlier 25 . Secondly, younger people have not yet had enough experience to develop self-protection skills, explaining, at least in part, the greater likelihood of WA in this age group 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust evidence indicates that IPV compromises parenting quality and ability in ways that may affect health, cognitive development, and schooling, all of which impact adult economic and labor outcomes and thus influence an individual's bargaining power and experience of IPV ( Costa-Font & Ljunge, 2018 ; Villa, 2017 ). Parental stress/depression can compromise parent's ability to invest in their children's mental, physical and educational well-being (e.g., Holt et al, 2008 ; Mangiavacchi & Piccoli, 2018 ).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be explained by the well-known Healthy Worker Effect (HWE) which indicates that workers occupying higher positions in the firm, i.e. those who are allowed not to record their working time or to record it in a simplified way, are also those who have a higher educational status and are the most able to cope with hard labour without detrimental health consequences; this indicates a selection bias in line with the well-known social gradient in health (Shah, 2009;Costa-Font and Ljunge, 2018). Thus, our figures do not allow identifying an unambiguous link between modalities of working time recording and health conditions of the respondents.…”
Section: Profile Of the Respondentsmentioning
confidence: 99%