The health impacts of traffic-related exposures in urban areas: Understanding real effects, underlying driving forces and co-producing future directions

Abstract

The world is currently witnessing its largest surge of urban growth in human history; a trend that draws attention to the need to understand and address health impacts of urban living. Whilst transport is instrumental in this urbanisation wave, it also has significant positive and negative impacts on population health, which are disproportionately distributed.In this paper, we bring together expertise in transport engineering, transport and urban planning, research and strategic management, epidemiology and health impact assessment in an exercise to scope and discuss the health impacts of transport in urban areas. Adopting a cross-disciplinary, coproduction approach, we explore the key driving forces behind the current state of urban mobility and outline recommendations for practices that could facilitate positioning health at the core of transport design, planning and policy.Current knowledge on the health-related impacts of urban transport shows that motor vehicle traffic is causing significant premature mortality and morbidity through motor vehicle crashes, physical inactivity and traffic-related environmental exposures including increases in air pollution, noise and temperature levels, as well as reductions in green space. Trends of rapid and car-centred urbanisation, mass motorisation and a tendency of policy to favour car mobility and undervalue health in the transport and development agenda has both led to, and exacerbated the negative health impacts of the transport systems. Simultaneously, we also argue that the benefits of new transport schemes on the economy are emphasised whilst the range and severity of identified health impacts associated with transport are often downplayed. We conclude the paper by outlining stakeholders recommendations for the adoption of a cross-disciplinary co-production approach that takes a health-aware perspective and has the potential to promote a paradigm shift in transport practices.

Health Impact Assessment of Cycling Network Expansions in European Cities

“…There is increasing awareness of the adverse effects of the car-centric urban mobility plans of previous decades (Nieuwenhuijsen and Khreis, 2016). Concerns are sustained on ecological issues such as high levels of pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, the loss of natural outdoor environments and their eco-systems their eco-systems, but also on economic issues of space scarcity, congestion costs and financing infrastructure (Khreis et al, 2016;Marqués et al, 2015).…”

Integrating health and transportation in Nashville, Tennessee, USA: From policy to projects

“…Conversely, the risks of collisions while walking and bicycling could increase more quickly, resulting in immediate costs. The net benefits could also be underestimated because ITHIM does not model emerging benefits of shifting travel behavior such as reduced noise pollution and mental health benefits (19, 20). Despite the limitations, the usefulness of having the economic benefit component of the model is to help place potential health savings and transportation spending in a common metric (US dollars).…”

Analysis of interdomain taxonomic patterns in urban street mats

“…in indoor environments including hospital and mass transit systems, urban recreational water, etc.) and promote our understanding on the impacts of long-term anthropogenic pressure on environmental resources (Khreis et al, 2016;Shamarina et al, 2017). Microbial diversity and species assemblages have been shown to respond to urbanization and to be largely influenced by site characteristics, land cover or architectural design (Kembel et al, 2012).…”