“…In the past 10 years, all six have been fulfilled. The DAP has been factor analyzed (Nichols and Strumpfer, 1962); reliability has been assessed, taking into account the criticism of percentage of agreement as a measure of reliability (Guinan & Hurley, 1965;Hammer & Kaplan, 1964a, 1964bLitt & Margolies, 1966;Starr & Marcuse, 1959;Strumpfer, 1963); extended drawing techniques have been used (Berryman, 1959;Craddick, 1963;Handler & Reyher, 1964;Kamano, 1960;Whitaker, 1961); clinical studies have reported the results of drawings obtained serially during the course of an illness (Mabry, 1964;Rosenberg, 1965); patterns of signs of psychopathology have been assessed (Grams & Rinder, 1958;Griffith & Payman, 1959;Hoyt & Baron, 1958;Koppitz, 1966aKoppitz, , 1966bKoppitz, , 1966cRibler, 1957;Wildman, 1963); and specific hypotheses concerning psychopathology and figure drawings have been tested (Armstrong & Hauck, 1961;Baldwin, 1964;Davids & DeVault, 1960;Fisher, 1959;Gray & Pepitone, 1964;Kurtzberg et al, 1966;Lawton & Sechrest, 1962;Orgel, 1959). The research published in the recent past is clearly more sophisticated than the studies reported prior to 1957.…”