2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hausman pretest estimator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has been used by a number of researchers in related studies (Campa and Kedia, 2002;Villalonga, 2004;Khandker and Faruqee, 2003). This is further supported by the view expressed by Chmelarova and Hill (2010) that if independent variables are endogenous and there are valid IV available, then it is better to use the IV approach since OLS will yield inconsistent estimates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This approach has been used by a number of researchers in related studies (Campa and Kedia, 2002;Villalonga, 2004;Khandker and Faruqee, 2003). This is further supported by the view expressed by Chmelarova and Hill (2010) that if independent variables are endogenous and there are valid IV available, then it is better to use the IV approach since OLS will yield inconsistent estimates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Let us now consider (14). Vector S t is iid by Assumption 1, and E(S t ) = 0 under the null hypothesis of exogeneity at and Assumption 2(vi).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note …rst that (i) the constant matrix D in (14) identical to that of the standard Hausman test statistic; and second, that (ii) the covariance matrix of S t in (14) is also identical to the corresponding covariance matrix of the Hausman test statistic, except that the scalar terms ij are di¤erent. 8 Noting that T 1=2 (~ (2) ^ (2) ) = R (2) T 1=2 (^ 0 ), we have…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations