2009
DOI: 10.1080/08351810802671735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Haunting Question of Textual Agency: Derrida and Garfinkel on Iterability and Eventfulness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the Derridaean conceptual background that inspires this analytical framework offers promising avenues to study the role of communication in (dis)organizing processes. The work of Derrida has rarely been mobilized in the organizational and management literatures (for exceptions, see Brummans, 2007;Cooren, 2009;Griffin et al, forthcoming). Yet, as we showed in this paper, his work can strongly contribute to a subtle understanding of the dynamics of (written) language (i.e., presence/absence) and, more specifically, account for the role of texts in organizations, from a non-dualistic and processual perspective (see also Cooren, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the Derridaean conceptual background that inspires this analytical framework offers promising avenues to study the role of communication in (dis)organizing processes. The work of Derrida has rarely been mobilized in the organizational and management literatures (for exceptions, see Brummans, 2007;Cooren, 2009;Griffin et al, forthcoming). Yet, as we showed in this paper, his work can strongly contribute to a subtle understanding of the dynamics of (written) language (i.e., presence/absence) and, more specifically, account for the role of texts in organizations, from a non-dualistic and processual perspective (see also Cooren, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suggestion that organizations are not either present or absent, but rather at once present and absent (Cooren et al, 2009) is not new in itself. Karl E. Weick (1979,1995,2010) has shown over the years that an organization partially epitomizes a mirage or a myth that always eludes us.…”
Section: Presence and Absencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Wherever we go, it seems, the organization follows us, haunts us (Bencherki & Cooren, 2011;Cooren, 2009): like the devotee who is inhabited by a spirit, organizational members and researchers are made to do things by the organization they belong to and that possesses them in return. Their values creep into our hearts, their procedures guide our actions, their symbols adorn our clothes, their technologies mediate our understanding of the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"For another next first time" is a the very nice expression used by Garfinkel to express both the iterable and eventful character of action, which, in many respects, parallels Derrida's (1990) analysis of (speech) acts (see Cooren, 2009a). As Rawls points out, "Each next first time" signifies that while each next case of action is different, each next case of a particular recognizable sort of action must also be "another" one of something that has been recognized before.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%