1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4655(98)00174-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GW space-time method for the self-energy of large systems

Abstract: ArticleWe present a detailed account of the GW space-time method. The method increases the size of systems whose electronic structure can be studied with a computational implementation of Hedin's GW approximation. At the heart of the method is a representation of the Green's function G and the screened Coulomb interaction W in the real-space and imaginary-time domain, which allows a more efficient computation of the self-energy approximation Σ = iGW . For intermediate steps we freely change between representat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
181
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(63 reference statements)
4
181
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For all energy bands, our results are in excellent agreement with those of other calculations using pseudopotentials, and plane-wave basis set, and full frequency integration (no plasmon-pole models). 10,28,50 In the vicinity of the valence band maximum (VBM) our results are also consistent with those obtained with plasmon-pole models. 51,52 However, as one moves away from the VBM, significant differences are found, e.g., our computed valence-band width is 11.64 eV, while it is 11.90-11.95 eV when using plasmon-pole models.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For all energy bands, our results are in excellent agreement with those of other calculations using pseudopotentials, and plane-wave basis set, and full frequency integration (no plasmon-pole models). 10,28,50 In the vicinity of the valence band maximum (VBM) our results are also consistent with those obtained with plasmon-pole models. 51,52 However, as one moves away from the VBM, significant differences are found, e.g., our computed valence-band width is 11.64 eV, while it is 11.90-11.95 eV when using plasmon-pole models.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…24,25 (iii) the correlation self-energy Σ c (iω) over a wide frequency range is evaluated by the Lanczos algorithm, 26 and its value in the real frequency domain is then obtained by analytical continuation methods, 27,28 thus no plasmon-pole model is needed. Details of the iterative calculations of dielectric eigenvectors and the Lanczos algorithm can be found in Appendix A and B, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resolving the 3s-and 3p-derived bands in ScN with plane-waves thus only requires a cutoff of 80 Ry [34] and makes ScN an ideal candidate for constructing a comparison between LDA + 0 0 G W and OEPx(cLDA) + 0 0 G W calculations. However, the negative LDA band gap (see Table 4) impedes the direct application of the LDA + 0 0 G W formalism with our GW code, since in its current implementation [112][113][114] a clear separation between conduction and valence bands is required. Therefore, an indirect approach is adopted.…”
Section: D-electron Binding Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, one can fit ⌺ XC on the complex axis with a simple analytic expression, to be continued to the real axis. 25 The multipole one is perhaps the more common:…”
Section: Appendix B: Analytic Continuation Of Frequency Integralsmentioning
confidence: 99%