2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.87.155148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GWcalculations using the spectral decomposition of the dielectric matrix: Verification, validation, and comparison of methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
144
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(60 reference statements)
4
144
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in close agreement with the 7.45 eV and 4.40 eV plane wave G 0 W 0 @LDA values of Ref. 40 (LDA geometry). The G 0 W 0 @LDA gap remains smaller than the ∼4.9 eV experimental value, an issue that will be addressed by the partially self-consistent scheme used in the present study, as discussed below.…”
Section: Technical Detailssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is in close agreement with the 7.45 eV and 4.40 eV plane wave G 0 W 0 @LDA values of Ref. 40 (LDA geometry). The G 0 W 0 @LDA gap remains smaller than the ∼4.9 eV experimental value, an issue that will be addressed by the partially self-consistent scheme used in the present study, as discussed below.…”
Section: Technical Detailssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The most computationally intensive element in the GW method, the calculation of the polarization potential (screen Coulomb interaction), involves an algorithmic complexity that scales as the fourth power of the system size [33,34]. Various approaches have been developed to reduce the computational bottlenecks of the GW approach [8,18,23,[33][34][35][36][37]. Despite these advances, GW calculations are still quite expensive for many of the intended applications in the fields of materials science, surface science and nanoscience.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Kohn-Sham DFT (KS-DFT) approximations predict poorly quasiparticle excitation energies both in confined and in extended systems, [2][3][4] even for the frontier occupied orbital energy, for which KS-DFT is expected to be exact. [5][6][7] This has led to the development of two main first-principles alternative frameworks for quasiparticle excitations: many-body perturbation theory, mainly within the so-called GW approximation 8 on top of DFT, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and generalized-KS DFT. [26][27][28][29][30] Recently, range-separated hybrid (RSH) functionals 31-37 combined with an optimally-tuned range parameter 38,39 were shown to very successfully predict quasiparticle band gaps, band edge energies and excitation energies for a range of interesting small molecular systems, well matching both experimental results and GW predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%