1961
DOI: 10.1080/00236566108583870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The growth of American unions, 1945–1960

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All four countries mentioned above have experienced a negative trend in trade union membership; in fact, reduced or negative membership growth was recorded in virtually all OECD countries, with Finland, Sweden, and Iceland being the only exceptions (Visser, 1991). The link between trade union membership and power has been generally accepted, although researchers have drawn attention to other factors contributing to trade union power, such as trade union leadership (Barnett, 1921;Bernstein, 1954;Bain and Price, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All four countries mentioned above have experienced a negative trend in trade union membership; in fact, reduced or negative membership growth was recorded in virtually all OECD countries, with Finland, Sweden, and Iceland being the only exceptions (Visser, 1991). The link between trade union membership and power has been generally accepted, although researchers have drawn attention to other factors contributing to trade union power, such as trade union leadership (Barnett, 1921;Bernstein, 1954;Bain and Price, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One group of studies was excluded, even though relevant to the issue of union elections, because the researchers did not specifically seek to better understand the election outcome itself. Several of these studies incorporated some data on elections, but they focused primarily on union membership growth (Adams and Krislov, 1974;Ashenfelter and Pencavel, 1969;Bernstein, 1961;Freeman and Medoff, 1979;Hirsch, 1980;Moore and Newman, 1975;Sandver and Heneman, 1981). Other studies in this excluded group used as their dependent variable some proxy for the actual vote or election outcome, such as the intention to vote for representation, the perceived need for unionization, or workers' attitudes toward unions (Allen and Keaveny, 1981;Bigoness, 1978;Feuille and Blandin, 1974;Flango, 1975;Gordon and Long, 1981;Kochan, 1979;Sandver, 1977;Youngblood, DeNisi, and Mobley, 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, part of the military wage differential is attributable to the industries' higher proportion of union members and smaller proportion of women. Unions were particularly successful in organizing military industries during both world wars when management resistance was weak (Bernstein, 1954). This could explain the higher unionization rates existing in military industries today.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%