1983
DOI: 10.1177/001979398303600402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the Outcome of Union Certification Elections: A Review of the Literature

Abstract: This paper reviews the large body of literature examining the outcomes of NLRB certification elections. The authors first review the major patterns of the research conducted to date and then analyze twenty-nine studies in depth. These studies exemplify the range of methodologies used and results obtained within each of the two major kinds of election studies: those analyzing data gathered from individual voters and those analyzing NLRB data on election units. The review concludes with an appraisal of the curre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 compares other observable characteristics: the union density of the MSA, the size of the bargaining unit, the proportion of cases in manufacturing establishments, and the proportion in right--to--work states. Studies have found all of these factors correlated with election outcomes (see Heneman and Sandver 1983;Riddell 2004;and Ferguson 2008 for reviews), as indeed the curves in figures 2 and 3 suggest. In each of these cases though crossing the 50--percent threshold is not associated with a striking change in the level of the variable concerned-unlike unionization itself, which is a step function at 50 percent support.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3 compares other observable characteristics: the union density of the MSA, the size of the bargaining unit, the proportion of cases in manufacturing establishments, and the proportion in right--to--work states. Studies have found all of these factors correlated with election outcomes (see Heneman and Sandver 1983;Riddell 2004;and Ferguson 2008 for reviews), as indeed the curves in figures 2 and 3 suggest. In each of these cases though crossing the 50--percent threshold is not associated with a striking change in the level of the variable concerned-unlike unionization itself, which is a step function at 50 percent support.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Unlike most work that uses union--representation election data (e.g., Heneman and Sandver 1983;Maranto and Fiorito 1987;Fiorito, Jarley, and Delaney 1995;Bronfenbrenner 1997;Riddell 2004;Ferguson 2008), I do not try to predict or model the success of particular campaigns. Quite the opposite: I focus on very close elections, those where success is least predictable.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased workloads may ultimately lead to lower levels of job satisfaction. Job dissatisfaction and autocratic leadership catalyze the decision to unionize, as it provides workers with a collective voice and a way to eliminate sources of dissatisfaction (Brett, 1980;Freeman and Medoff, 1984;Heneman and Sandver, 1983;Premack and Hunter, 1988). Are lower levels of job satisfaction related to higher propensities to join a union in Canada?…”
Section: Organizational and Work Related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideological orientation and attitudes of workers to unions may also influence the decision, with those holding left-leaning positions more prone to unionization (Adams, 1974;Heneman and Sandver, 1983;Kochan, 1979). Workers and students may join unions because of their political and ideological beliefs and philosophies (Wheeler and McClendon, 1991;Hemmasi and Graf, 1993).…”
Section: Personal Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employees involved in labor movements were usually dissatisfied with certain aspects of their jobs (DeCotiis & LeLouarn, 1981;Heneman III & Sandver, 1982;Visser, 2002;Dhammika, Fias & Sam, 2012). However, researches indicate that job dissatisfaction was not sufficient to result in unionization (Premack & Hunter, 1988) -employees would only unionize if they believed that the union could eliminate the source of their job dissatisfaction or improve their working conditions (Charlwood, 2002;DeCotiis & LeLouarn, 1981;Kochan, 1979;Youngblood, DeNisi, Molleston & Mobley, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%