The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior

Abstract

The group engagement model expands the insights of the group-value model of procedural justice and the relational model of authority into an explanation for why procedural justice shapes cooperation in groups, organizations, and societies. It hypothesizes that procedures are important because they shape people's social identity within groups, and social identity in turn influences attitudes, values, and behaviors. The model further hypothesizes that resource judgments exercise their influence indirectly by shaping social identity. This social identity mediation hypothesis explains why people focus on procedural justice, and in particular on procedural elements related to the quality of their interpersonal treatment, because those elements carry the most social identity-relevant information. In this article, we review several key insights of the group engagement model, relate these insights to important trends in psychological research on justice, and discuss implications of the model for the future of procedural justice research.

Pengaruh Keadilan Distributif dan Prosedural Kompensasi terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dan Kinerja Perawat di RSU DR. H. RM. SOESELO di Slawi, Kabupaten Tegal, Jawa Tengah

“…Keadilan prosedural menjelaskan bahwa orang tidak hanya melakukan evaluasi hasil, tetapi juga melakukan evaluasi prosedural untuk menentukan alokasi tersebut (Taylor et al, 1995;Tyler dan Blader, 2003). Tjahyono (2011) menegaskan bahwa keadilan prosedural merupakan mekanisme yang adil untuk memperoleh kesejahteraan yang diharapkan.…”

Team conflict management and team effectiveness: the effects of task interdependence and team identification

“…One of the major managerial practices to enhance team identification is to increase team member participation in decision-making processes. Active participation enhances involvement, commitment, and a sense of belonging, which in turn lead to a higher level of team identification (Tyler & Blader, 2003). The relationship between task interdependence and team identity may also be enhanced by creating high goal interdependence among team members (van der Vegt et al, 2003).…”

Denunciar lo injusto: La crítica social de las clases medias y su relación con el cambio y la reproducción social

“…Entre los marcos de referencia pueden distinguirse al menos tres: igualdad de oportunidades, igualdad de trato e igualdad de posiciones. Estos son los grandes referentes que cimientan los principios de justicia detrás de la crítica social en la actualidad (e.g., Dubet, 2013;Tyler & Blader, 2003).…”

“…Además, agregamos un tercero que ha sido destacado en la investigación empírica reciente en Chile: la igualdad de trato (Araujo, 2016;Mac-Clure & Barozet, 2016). Este último, además, se relaciona con los hallazgos sobre justicia procedimental, según la que para las evaluaciones de justicia no solo son relevantes los resultados, sino también los procedimientos con que se obtienen los últimos (Thibaut & Walker, 1975;Tyler & Blader, 2003).…”