2006
DOI: 10.2991/jnmp.2006.13.s.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The graphical calculus for ribbon categories: Algebras, modules, Nakayama automorphisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (Fuchs 2006) it is further graphically shown, that the Nakayama automorphism α = β l β r is actually an algebra automorphism. Compare this form of α with the form for α given in (3-17) which does not use the closed structure or the braid.…”
Section: Graphical Characterization Of Frobenius Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (Fuchs 2006) it is further graphically shown, that the Nakayama automorphism α = β l β r is actually an algebra automorphism. Compare this form of α with the form for α given in (3-17) which does not use the closed structure or the braid.…”
Section: Graphical Characterization Of Frobenius Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A main characterization of a Frobenius algebra in theorem 3.6, and one which generalizes, is given by the Frobenius isomorphism A A ∼ = A A * of the left A -modules. The Frobenius bilinear form and its dual allow us to construct such morphisms together with the closed structures (Fuchs 2006, Fuchs & Stigner 2008. We define left/right module maps β r ∈ Hom(A, A * ) , β l ∈ Hom(A, * A) and their inverses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%