2012
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1202.6380
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some graphical aspects of Frobenius structures

Bertfried Fauser

Abstract: We survey some aspects of Frobenius algebras, Frobenius structures and their relation to finite Hopf algebras using graphical calculus. We focus on the 'yanking' moves coming from a closed structure in a rigid monoidal category, the topological move, and the 'yanking' coming from the Frobenius bilinear form and its inverse, used e.g. in quantum teleportation. We discus how to interpret the associated information flow. Some care is taken to cover nonsymmetric Frobenius algebras and the Nakayama automorphism. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, in abstract, categorical formulations, a 'measurement basis' is accorded a separate significance, and is regarded as a foundational axiomatic datum equated to the presence of Frobenius algebraic structures [79,41]. Indeed, the basic 'splitting operator' δ , in our multilinear tensor formulation in §2.1, δ(e i ) = i e i ⊗ e i , is precisely the Frobenius comultiplication of [41] (see also [42]). In that case, there is the accompanying multiplication, µ(e i ⊗ e j ) = e i δ i,j .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, in abstract, categorical formulations, a 'measurement basis' is accorded a separate significance, and is regarded as a foundational axiomatic datum equated to the presence of Frobenius algebraic structures [79,41]. Indeed, the basic 'splitting operator' δ , in our multilinear tensor formulation in §2.1, δ(e i ) = i e i ⊗ e i , is precisely the Frobenius comultiplication of [41] (see also [42]). In that case, there is the accompanying multiplication, µ(e i ⊗ e j ) = e i δ i,j .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, we have seen that there is deep algebraic structure bound up with the tensorial construction of the theoretical; phylogenetic branching models. From the Lie algebraic point of view, the emergence of the original coproduct ∇ L with its additional 'quadratic' cross term, is unusual, in that the usual coproduct 42 is the minimal (or primitive) choice ∆(L) = L ⊗ 1 + 1 ⊗ L. We emphasize that ∇ is also a linear operator, but whose cross terms are defined with reference to the form of the generators in the standard, distinguished basis. It is unknown to what extent the homomorphism property extends to other phlyogenetic Lie-Markov models, for example those within the S 2 S 2 class (see figure 5).…”
Section: Coproducts and Phylogenetic Bialgebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Frobenius algebras (FA) have been extensively studied in representation theory and have recently experienced a renewed interest in the context of topological quantum field theory [19], quantum foundations [20] and even natural language processing [21]. See [22] for a survey on graphical aspects. A cause of this multidisciplinary interest is their intuitive topological calculus.…”
Section: Flexibility Of Frobenius Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%