1977
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-197706000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Graft-Versus-Host Reactivity in Ag-B/MLR Disparate Strains of Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequencies of the different H-1 genotypes that are to be expected if the sample of wild rats tested represents a random breeding population are not significantly different from those which have been actually observed ( Table 3). The occurrence of inbred strain MLR antigens in wild rats does not seem to be unusual, as it has been described for wild rat populations of different geographic origin [22]. This latter report [22], the data presented here as well as own unpublished results indicate that the extent of the polymorphism of the MHC in wild rats seems to be in the range of that found for man rather than being as large as in wild mice [5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frequencies of the different H-1 genotypes that are to be expected if the sample of wild rats tested represents a random breeding population are not significantly different from those which have been actually observed ( Table 3). The occurrence of inbred strain MLR antigens in wild rats does not seem to be unusual, as it has been described for wild rat populations of different geographic origin [22]. This latter report [22], the data presented here as well as own unpublished results indicate that the extent of the polymorphism of the MHC in wild rats seems to be in the range of that found for man rather than being as large as in wild mice [5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The occurrence of inbred strain MLR antigens in wild rats does not seem to be unusual, as it has been described for wild rat populations of different geographic origin [22]. This latter report [22], the data presented here as well as own unpublished results indicate that the extent of the polymorphism of the MHC in wild rats seems to be in the range of that found for man rather than being as large as in wild mice [5]. Each (T, G)-A--L responder haplotype was associated with low responsiveness to (H, G)-A--L and vice versa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…These latter antigens are shared between the RTI ~ and RT1 d (A.14), and RT1 b and RT1 a (A.18) haplotypes. From the data presented it must be concluded, that the R T1 " hyplotype is not identical to that of BN.DA (R T1 a) or AUG (R TI~)nor does it represent a combination of both as reported earlier by Cramer et al (1977b) and Radka et al (1977). Of the remaining two A antigens, A.45 is considered to be a private class I antigen of MNR, and A.43 is considered to be a public determinant shared by DA and AUG. Of the B antigens, B.1, 2, 3, and 4 are private determinants of the RTI", RTF, and RT1 ~ haplotypes, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Previous immunogenetic studies had demonstrated that the RT1 m haplotype was distinct from the RT1 o and RT1 d haplotypes with respect to the MHC class II region, including the alleles expressed at the TAP2 locus (10,34,35). We now hypothesized that the previous classification of RT1 m class Ia Ags as separate and distinct from those of the RT1 o and RT1 d haplotypes (36) was a consequence of this TAP polymorphism, and represented a new example of class I modification (cim) (see introduction).…”
Section: Class I Modification (Cim) In the Rt1 M Haplotypementioning
confidence: 99%