2008
DOI: 10.5465/amle.2008.35882196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) is Even More Valid Than We Thought: A New Development in Meta-Analysis and Its Implications for the Validity of the GMAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with those of meta-analysis reported by Kuncel et al (2007) and Oh et al (2008). Both studies found a positive and significant relation between GGPA and GMAT and UGPA as predictors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our findings are consistent with those of meta-analysis reported by Kuncel et al (2007) and Oh et al (2008). Both studies found a positive and significant relation between GGPA and GMAT and UGPA as predictors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The GMAT questions, in addition to being translated into Portuguese, were selected from publically available exams. Several studies have found that university admission tests are highly correlated with IQ, in particular correcting for non-linearity (Frey & Detterman, 2004), and seem to be good predictors of performance in graduate school (Kuncel, Credé, & Thomas, 2007;Oh, Schmidt, Shaffer, & Le, 2008). Correlations between the Wonderlic and the GMAT of 0.56 have been reported (Pesta & Poznanski, 2009), and reach 0.60 when corrected for unreliability in both measures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…GMAT has been shown to be a significant predictor of performance in MBA programs (Oh, Schmidt, Shaffer, & Le, 2008). Students' first language was self-reported, and was coded as non-English ϭ 0, English ϭ 1.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%