2004
DOI: 10.3368/aoj.54.1.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gradient AC/A Ratio: What's Really Normal?

Abstract: The two most commonly used methods for determining the AC/A ratio are the Gradient Method and the Clinical Method. Though both methods are simple, practical, and often used interchangeably, they are really quite different. The Gradient AC/A measures the amount of convergence generated by a diopter of accommodative effort, while the Clinical Method detects the presence of a distance-near disparity of 10 or more prism diopters of esotropia. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the Gradient and Cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AC/A ratio was measured using the gradient method. 13 Fusion was first assessed with worth four-dot test and then near stereoacuity in current refractive correction was measured with Titmus fly stereotest and stereoacuity of o100 s of arc was defined as good. Postoperative, improved stereopsis was defined as a decrease of ≥ 2 octaves at the last follow-up visit or before reoperation, and decreased stereopsis was defined as an increase of ≥ 2 octaves.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AC/A ratio was measured using the gradient method. 13 Fusion was first assessed with worth four-dot test and then near stereoacuity in current refractive correction was measured with Titmus fly stereotest and stereoacuity of o100 s of arc was defined as good. Postoperative, improved stereopsis was defined as a decrease of ≥ 2 octaves at the last follow-up visit or before reoperation, and decreased stereopsis was defined as an increase of ≥ 2 octaves.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bruce, Atchison, and Bhoola (1995) found a higher group mean AC/A ratio than the present study (see Table 1) although the study by Bruce, Atchison, and Bhoola (1995) used a distance target for AC/A measurement compared with the near target used in the present study. As has been mentioned previously, the effect of proximal stimulation on the relationship between AC/A ratios obtained at different viewing distances is still unclear (Jackson & Arnoldi, 2004;Pankhania & Firth, 2011), and this makes a direct comparison with the present results difficult. It is well established that voluntary effort can significantly affect oculomotor responses in open-loop conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The same study also found no correlation between the response AC/A ratios measured using the target at these two distances (Pankhania & Firth, 2011). Another study did find a significant correlation between the AC/A ratio measured at distance and near (r 2 = 0.2601) and found no significant difference between the AC/A ratios measured using a distance or a near target (Jackson & Arnoldi, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…1D that textbooks tell us to expect [4][5][6] and ratios obtained using different methods, which should be the same, rarely correlate. 5,7,8 Importantly, most laboratory research, which is often used to extrapolate to clinical situations, uses response AC/A ratios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%